MCP Me
Your AI assistants don't know who you are. mcp-me fixes that: a local MCP server that gives any AI a full picture of who you are
Is MCP Me safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Compare MCP Me
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
- Unreal Engine API Documentation +0.2 higher
- Web Researcher MCP +0.1 higher
- Desktop Commander MCP 0.1 lower
In detail: MCP Me scores 61.4/100 (Grade C), ranked #596 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.5/10; 18% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-11. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How MCP Me compares in MCP Servers
- #333 Unreal Engine API Documentation 61.6 +0.2
- #334 Web Researcher MCP 61.5 +0.1
- #335 MCP Me 61.4 this agent
- #336 Desktop Commander MCP 61.3 −0.1
- #337 Replicant MCP 61.3 −0.1
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks MCP Me’s 61.4.
Where the 61.4 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
61.4 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceMCP Me MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
29.8 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about MCP Me
Does MCP Me publish package provenance?
Does MCP Me have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is MCP Me actively maintained?
What license does MCP Me use?
Are MCP Me's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to MCP Me's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain MCP Me?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores MCP Me from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-me)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-me"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-me.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON