MCP Victoriametrics

The implementation of Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for VictoriaMetrics

MCP Servers Go Grade D Listed Apache-2.0
49.8/100
Rank #769 of 1320
Compare MCP Victoriametrics

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-23 · 12d ago
Recent change
Rank +11

Is MCP Victoriametrics safe? MCP Victoriametrics scores 49.8/100 (Grade D), ranked #769 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.6/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-23. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#754 → #769)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 43 spots (#711 → #754)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 37 spots (#674 → #711)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.6/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
44.3
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#403

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-04 14:03 UTC · Repo last pushed 12 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars
229
Forks
28
Last Push
2026-08-23
12 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
5
Rank Change
▼15
was #754

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

49.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

MCP Victoriametrics MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
9.5 / 25
in line with avg 9.5
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.6 below avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.6 / 17
in line with avg 11.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
11.2 / 20
1.0 below avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
5.7 / 20
0.5 below avg 6.2

Activity Inputs

44.3 / 100
StarsRepository reach
14.2 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
23.3 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
6.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
3.6 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 30, 2026
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 0
Branch-Protection 1
CI-Tests 9
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 5
Contributors 6
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 3
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 4
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is MCP Victoriametrics safe?

Public trust evidence for MCP Victoriametrics is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does MCP Victoriametrics publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for MCP Victoriametrics. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does MCP Victoriametrics have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
MCP Victoriametrics has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.6/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is MCP Victoriametrics actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 12 days ago.
What license does MCP Victoriametrics use?
MCP Victoriametrics ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are MCP Victoriametrics's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to MCP Victoriametrics are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
MCP Victoriametrics appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
low confidence
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain MCP Victoriametrics?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores MCP Victoriametrics from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 17Grade 2Listed 1HVTrust 1Scorecard 1
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#754 → #769)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 43 spots (#711 → #754)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 37 spots (#674 → #711)
2026-09-01
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#649 → #674)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#614 → #649)
2026-08-30
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.6/10
2026-08-30
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 525 spots (#1139 → #614)
2026-08-30
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 28.2pts (21.8 → 50.0)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#1108 → #1139)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#1084 → #1108)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#1061 → #1084)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 74 spots (#987 → #1061)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#973 → #984)
2026-08-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 58 spots (#1031 → #973)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#1038 → #1026)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 37 spots (#1001 → #1038)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#993 → #1005)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 13 spots (#1006 → #993)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 57 spots (#947 → #1004)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #933

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 49.8 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-victoriametrics.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-victoriametrics)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-victoriametrics"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-victoriametrics.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON