Is ACI.dev safe to use?

ACI.dev has an HVTrust score of 48.2/100 (Grade D), ranked #464 of 1204 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for ACI.dev?

ACI.dev scores 48.2/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 4.9k GitHub stars and is categorized under Protocols & Tool Integration.

ACI.dev

aipotheosis-labs/aci

ACI.dev is the open source tool-calling platform that hooks up 600+ tools into any agentic IDE or custom AI agent throug

Protocols & Tool Integration Python Grade D Listed Apache-2.0

48.2/100

Rank #464 of 1204

Compare ACI.dev

How does it stack up against its Protocols & Tool Integration neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-05-28 · 73d ago

Recent change

Tool Surface Changed +2

Is ACI.dev safe? ACI.dev scores 48.2/100 (Grade D), ranked #464 of 1204 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.2/10; 93% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-05-28. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Protocols & Tool Integration

#29 MetaMCP — 48.7 (D) → #30 Klavis AI — 48.7 (D) → #32 CrewAI tools — 47.0 (D) → #33 mcpo — 45.6 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-08-09

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: extension-based → declared

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 120 spots (#345 → #465)

2026-08-07

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → extension-based

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.2/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 73 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for ACI.dev View Protocols & Tool Integration Report missing data

49.5

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#31

In Protocols & Tool Integration

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Activity & Reach

Stars

4.9k

Forks

476

Last Push

2026-05-28

73 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▲1

was #465

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Protocols & Tool Integration

48.2 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

ACI.dev Protocols & Tool Integration average (44 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

9.9 / 25

in line with avg 10.2

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

1.0 below avg 11.8

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

12.1 / 17

in line with avg 12.3

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

7.1 / 20

7.6 below avg 14.7

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

8.9 / 20

1.7 below avg 10.6

Activity Inputs

49.5 / 100

StarsRepository reach

22.1 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

14.9 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

0.0 / 25

CommunityFork signal

12.5 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

4.2 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 9, 2026

Signed Commits

93%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 5

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 3

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 0

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 0

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 1

SAST 9

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Is ACI.dev safe?

Public trust evidence for ACI.dev is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does ACI.dev publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for ACI.dev. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does ACI.dev have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

ACI.dev has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.2/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is ACI.dev actively maintained?

Slowing down. Last push was 73 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.

What license does ACI.dev use?

ACI.dev ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are ACI.dev's commits signed?

93% of the last 100 commits to ACI.dev are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

medium confidence

Implemented

ACI.dev appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

5 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

database

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to ACI.dev's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-09

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: extension-based → declared

2026-08-07

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → extension-based

2026-07-17

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: ElevenLabs

Maintain ACI.dev?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores ACI.dev from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-09

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: extension-based → declared

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 120 spots (#345 → #465)

2026-08-07

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → extension-based

2026-07-24

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → D

2026-07-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#300 → #312)

2026-07-17

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: ElevenLabs

2026-07-15

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 5.0/10

2026-07-15

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-07-15

Rank Moved

Rank rose 123 spots (#409 → #286)

2026-07-15

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 31.2pts (20.8 → 52.0)

2026-07-14

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #409

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/aci-dev.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/aci-dev)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/aci-dev"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/aci-dev.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Protocols & Tool Integration

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON