Is Figma Context MCP safe to use?

Figma Context MCP has an HVTrust score of 55.2/100 (Grade C), ranked #395 of 1283 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Figma Context MCP?

Figma Context MCP scores 55.2/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 15.7k GitHub stars and is categorized under Protocols & Tool Integration.

Figma Context MCP

GLips/Figma-Context-MCP

MCP server to provide Figma layout information to AI coding agents like Cursor

Protocols & Tool Integration TypeScript Grade C Listed MIT

55.2/100

Rank #395 of 1283

Compare Figma Context MCP

How does it stack up against its Protocols & Tool Integration neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-08-07 · 8d ago

Recent change

Rank +4

Is Figma Context MCP safe? Figma Context MCP scores 55.2/100 (Grade C), ranked #395 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.4/10; 82% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-07. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Protocols & Tool Integration

#25 MCP Go — 60.2 (C) → #26 Agent Reach — 58.7 (C) → #28 MCP Bundles — 53.7 (C) → #29 FastMCP — 49.5 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-08-15

Rank Moved

Rank rose 15 spots (#410 → #395)

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#393 → #409)

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 12 spots (#405 → #393)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.4/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Figma Context MCP View Protocols & Tool Integration Report missing data

63.5

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#27

In Protocols & Tool Integration

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-15

Activity & Reach

Stars

15.7k

Forks

1.2k

Last Push

2026-08-07

8 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▲15

was #410

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Protocols & Tool Integration

55.2 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Figma Context MCP Protocols & Tool Integration average (57 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

9.6 / 25

1.0 above avg 8.6

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.9 below avg 11.7

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

12.2 / 17

0.8 above avg 11.4

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

11.5 / 20

2.3 below avg 13.8

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

10.1 / 20

in line with avg 10.4

Activity Inputs

63.5 / 100

StarsRepository reach

25.2 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

23.9 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

0.0 / 25

CommunityFork signal

14.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

4.4 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 15, 2026

Signed Commits

82%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests 9

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 2

Contributors 6

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Is Figma Context MCP safe?

Figma Context MCP has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does Figma Context MCP publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Figma Context MCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Figma Context MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Figma Context MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.4/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Figma Context MCP actively maintained?

Maintained. Last push was 8 days ago.

What license does Figma Context MCP use?

Figma Context MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Figma Context MCP's commits signed?

82% of the last 100 commits to Figma Context MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Figma Context MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

low confidence

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain Figma Context MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Figma Context MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-15

Rank Moved

Rank rose 15 spots (#410 → #395)

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#393 → #409)

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 12 spots (#405 → #393)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#386 → #404)

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 93 spots (#290 → #383)

2026-07-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#263 → #273)

2026-07-18

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 47 spots (#212 → #259)

2026-07-18

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust down 3.6pts (59.2 → 55.6)

2026-07-18

Activity Score Changed

Activity score down 11pts (77 → 66)

2026-07-15

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#198 → #208)

2026-07-14

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#183 → #198)

2026-07-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 24 spots (#159 → #183)

2026-06-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#161 → #174)

2026-06-22

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 4.4/10

2026-06-22

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-06-22

Rank Moved

Rank rose 101 spots (#257 → #156)

2026-06-22

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 34.4pts (25.4 → 59.8)

2026-06-21

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#242 → #257)

2026-06-20

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #242

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/figma-context-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/figma-context-mcp)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/figma-context-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/figma-context-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Protocols & Tool Integration

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON