wcgw has an HVTrust score of 59.4/100 (Grade C), ranked #651 of 1325 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for wcgw?

wcgw scores 59.4/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 677 GitHub stars and is categorized under Protocols & Tool Integration.

wcgw

rusiaaman/wcgw

Shell and coding agent on mcp clients

Protocols & Tool Integration Python Listed Apache-2.0

Is wcgw safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10

Provenance None

Signed commits 28%

Last push 14d ago

Compare wcgw

How does it stack up against its Protocols & Tool Integration neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: wcgw scores 59.4/100 (Grade C), ranked #651 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.3/10; 28% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-12. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How wcgw compares in Protocols & Tool Integration

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks wcgw’s 59.4.

Where the 59.4 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Protocols & Tool Integration average

59.4 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

wcgw Protocols & Tool Integration average (61 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

6.8 / 25

3.7 below avg 10.5

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.8 below avg 11.6

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

12.2 / 17

0.7 below avg 12.9

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

13.5 / 20

0.6 below avg 14.1

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

10.6 / 20

in line with avg 10.6

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, OpenAI

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for wcgw View Protocols & Tool Integration Report missing data

56.2

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#39

In Protocols & Tool Integration

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars

677

Forks

Last Push

2026-09-12

14 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

678

pypi

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼1

was #650

Analysis

Activity Inputs

56.2 / 100

StarsRepository reach

17.0 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

23.1 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

7.5 / 25

CommunityFork signal

8.5 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

4.3 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 20, 2026

Signed Commits

28%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 3

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 0

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 6

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about wcgw

wcgw has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does wcgw publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for wcgw. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does wcgw have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

wcgw has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is wcgw actively maintained?

Maintained. Last push was 14 days ago.

What license does wcgw use?

wcgw ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are wcgw's commits signed?

28% of the last 100 commits to wcgw are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

wcgw appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

2 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to wcgw's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, OpenAI

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-03

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: marketplace → none

Maintain wcgw?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores wcgw from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, OpenAI

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank rose 254 spots (#895 → #641)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 32.7pts (26.9 → 59.6)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #895

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 31 spots (#622 → #653)

2026-09-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 149 spots (#771 → #622)

2026-09-12

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 4.7pts (55.0 → 59.7)

2026-09-12

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 12pts (46 → 58)

2026-09-09

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#750 → #765)

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 36 spots (#707 → #743)

2026-09-06

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 88 spots (#619 → #707)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 108 spots (#511 → #619)

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 21 spots (#490 → #511)

2026-09-03

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: marketplace → none

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank rose 32 spots (#522 → #490)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#511 → #522)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#497 → #511)

2026-08-31

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 4.1/10

2026-08-31

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank rose 507 spots (#1004 → #497)

2026-08-31

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 22.9pts (33.4 → 56.3)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 51 spots (#953 → #1004)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 50 spots (#903 → #953)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 33 spots (#870 → #903)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 24 spots (#846 → #870)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 108 spots (#738 → #846)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#713 → #728)

2026-08-10

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #712

GitHub → PyPI: wcgw

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/wcgw.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/wcgw)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/wcgw"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/wcgw.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Protocols & Tool Integration

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON