RegistryCompare › Flowise vs Nocobase

Flowise vs Nocobase

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Flowise and Nocobase, two Workflow Platforms projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Nocobase leads on trust — 66.3/100 (Grade B) vs 65.5/100 (Grade B), a 0.8-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal FlowiseFlowiseAI/Flowise Nocobasenocobase/nocobase
HVTrust score 65.5 66.3
Evidence grade B B
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #181 #166
Rank in Workflow Platforms #11 #9
GitHub stars 55.5k 24.3k
Last updated 39d ago today
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10 4.3 / 10
License NOASSERTION NOASSERTION
Downloads 6.9M/wk 17/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 12.5 8.9
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.6 12.2
Maintenance / 20 9.4 20.0
Adoption / 20 20.0 12.2
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Declared
External providers 6 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI, … 4 — Anthropic, DeepSeek, Google Gemini, …
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Unknown Match
Open in the live compare tool → Flowise profile Nocobase profile More Workflow Platforms →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →