Flowise

Build AI Agents, Visually

Workflow Platforms TypeScript Grade B Needs review NOASSERTION
71.9/100
Rank #117 of 1308
Compare Flowise

How does it stack up against its Workflow Platforms neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Needs review
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-13 · 12d ago
Recent change
Rank

Is Flowise safe? Flowise scores 71.9/100 (Grade B), ranked #117 of 1308 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 6.0/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-13. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Active listing, but review is needed
  • [5.1] repository is archived

Ranked neighbours in Workflow Platforms

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#115 → #125)
2026-08-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#91 → #107)
2026-08-13
Warning Issued
Warning: eligibility issues detected
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 6.0/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Review Flags
[5.1] repository is archived
86.3
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#6

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-25 07:02 UTC · Repo last pushed 12 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-25

Activity & Reach

Stars
55.4k
Forks
24.9k
Last Push
2026-08-13
12 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
13
Downloads (7d)
6,484,312
npm+docker
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
700
Rank Change
▲8
was #125

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Workflow Platforms

71.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Flowise Workflow Platforms average (24 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
12.5 / 25
2.3 above avg 10.2
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.9 below avg 11.7
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.6 / 17
1.2 above avg 12.4
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
15.8 / 20
2.5 below avg 18.3
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
20.0 / 20
7.4 above avg 12.6

Activity Inputs

86.3 / 100
StarsRepository reach
28.5 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
23.3 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
14.3 / 25
CommunityFork signal
20 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
6.0 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 25, 2026
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 6
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 10
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 9
Maintained 0
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 10
Security-Policy 9
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is Flowise safe?

Flowise has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Flowise publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Flowise. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Flowise have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Flowise has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 6.0/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Flowise actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 12 days ago.
What license does Flowise use?
Flowise ships under NOASSERTION. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Flowise's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to Flowise are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Compare Flowise head-to-head

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Flowise appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
6 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
medium confidence
1 tags
Broad capability areas detected.
  • database
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
low confidence
Unknown
Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Flowise?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Flowise from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 6HVTrust 2Score 1Warning Issued 1
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#115 → #125)
2026-08-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#91 → #107)
2026-08-13
Warning Issued
Warning: eligibility issues detected
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#64 → #75)
2026-06-15
Rank Moved
Rank rose 13 spots (#67 → #54)
2026-06-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#55 → #67)
2026-06-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 13 spots (#48 → #35)
2026-06-02
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 4.2pts (71.7 → 75.9)
2026-05-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 10.1pts (60.6 → 70.7)
2026-05-28
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 20pts (73 → 93)

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 71.9 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/flowise.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/flowise)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/flowise"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/flowise.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Workflow Platforms

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON