RegistryCompare › Airbyte vs Flowise

Airbyte vs Flowise

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Airbyte and Flowise, two Workflow Platforms projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Flowise leads on trust — 74.6/100 (Grade B) vs 66.5/100 (Grade B), a 8.1-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Airbyteairbytehq/airbyte FlowiseFlowiseAI/Flowise
HVTrust score 66.5 74.6
Evidence grade B B
Coverage grade C B
Overall rank #137 #79
Rank in Workflow Platforms #7 #5
GitHub stars 21.8k 55.1k
Last updated today 1d ago
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10 6.8 / 10
License NOASSERTION NOASSERTION
Downloads 6.5M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 11.0 13.5
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.6 14.3
Maintenance / 20 20.0 16.9
Adoption / 20 10.4 20.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 5 — Anthropic, OpenAI, Postgres, …
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Unknown
Open in the live compare tool → Airbyte profile Flowise profile More Workflow Platforms →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →