RegistryCompare › Flowise vs Flyte

Flowise vs Flyte

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Flowise and Flyte, two Workflow Platforms projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Flowise leads on trust — 73.2/100 (Grade B) vs 72.3/100 (Grade B), a 0.9-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal FlowiseFlowiseAI/Flowise Flyteflyteorg/flyte
HVTrust score 73.2 72.3
Evidence grade B B
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #107 #117
Rank in Workflow Platforms #6 #7
GitHub stars 55.4k 7.2k
Last updated 1d ago today
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10 5.9 / 10
License NOASSERTION Apache-2.0
Downloads 6.5M/wk 98k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 12.5 12.4
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.6 13.5
Maintenance / 20 17.1 20.0
Adoption / 20 20.0 15.9
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 6 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI, …
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Unknown Unknown
Open in the live compare tool → Flowise profile Flyte profile More Workflow Platforms →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →