AIPass vs Ruflo
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of AIPass and Ruflo, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
AIPass leads on trust — 86.3/100 (Grade A) vs 64.5/100 (Grade C), a 21.8-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | AIPassAIOSAI/AIPass | Rufloruvnet/ruflo |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 86.3 | 64.5 |
| Evidence grade | A | C |
| Coverage grade | B | C |
| Overall rank | #35 | #221 |
| Rank in Multi-Agent Systems | #1 | #5 |
| GitHub stars | 254 | 67.4k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 7.5 / 10 | 5.6 / 10 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Downloads | 676/wk | — |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 21.9 | 7.9 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.9 | 13.3 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 9.5 | 11.6 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Implemented |
| External providers | 2 — Anthropic, OpenAI | 2 — Anthropic, Supabase |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | extensions | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | — |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →