RegistryCompare › Agno vs LangGraph

Agno vs LangGraph

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agno and LangGraph, two Agent Frameworks projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

LangGraph leads on trust — 92.4/100 (Grade A) vs 87.1/100 (Grade A), a 5.3-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Agnoagno-agi/agno LangGraphlangchain-ai/langgraph
HVTrust score 87.1 92.4
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade A A
Overall rank #37 #4
Rank in Agent Frameworks #9 #3
GitHub stars 42.3k 42.1k
Last updated today 1d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10 6.8 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 369k/wk 9.9M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 18.5 21.0
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 12.6 14.3
Maintenance / 20 20.0 18.3
Adoption / 20 18.5 20.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 18 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Brave Search, …
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Match Partial
Open in the live compare tool → Agno profile LangGraph profile More Agent Frameworks →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →