RegistryCompare › Agno vs LangGraph

Agno vs LangGraph

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agno and LangGraph, two Agent Frameworks projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

LangGraph leads on trust — 92.8/100 (Grade A) vs 86.6/100 (Grade A), a 6.2-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Agnoagno-agi/agno LangGraphlangchain-ai/langgraph
HVTrust score 86.6 92.8
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade A A
Overall rank #35 #4
Rank in Agent Frameworks #8 #3
GitHub stars 41.7k 39.7k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10 7.0 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 532k/wk 17.5M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 17.9 21.2
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 12.2 14.4
Maintenance / 20 20.0 18.4
Adoption / 20 18.7 20.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 18 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Brave Search, …
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Match Partial
Open in the live compare tool → Agno profile LangGraph profile More Agent Frameworks →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →