RegistryCompare › Agent Infra Sandbox vs Fence

Agent Infra Sandbox vs Fence

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agent Infra Sandbox and Fence, two Sandboxes & Runtimes projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Fence leads on trust — 60.0/100 (Grade C) vs 53.8/100 (Grade C), a 6.2-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Agent Infra Sandboxagent-infra/sandbox Fencefencesandbox/fence
HVTrust score 53.8 60.0
Evidence grade C C
Coverage grade C C
Overall rank #456 #346
Rank in Sandboxes & Runtimes #6 #4
GitHub stars 5.8k 935
Last updated 1d ago 1d ago
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10 7.1 / 10
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 9.7 12.8
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.4 14.5
Maintenance / 20 12.9 15.7
Adoption / 20 9.0 7.1
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared
External providers 1 — OpenAI 1 — Redis
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface extensions
Provenance drift
Open in the live compare tool → Agent Infra Sandbox profile Fence profile More Sandboxes & Runtimes →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →