Is Agent Infra Sandbox safe to use?

Agent Infra Sandbox has an HVTrust score of 53.6/100 (Grade C), ranked #442 of 1308 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Agent Infra Sandbox?

Agent Infra Sandbox scores 53.6/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 5.7k GitHub stars and is categorized under Sandboxes & Runtimes.

Agent Infra Sandbox

agent-infra/sandbox

All-in-One Sandbox for AI Agents that combines Browser, Shell, File, MCP and VSCode Server in a single Docker container.

Sandboxes & Runtimes Python Grade C Listed Apache-2.0

53.6/100

Rank #442 of 1308

Compare Agent Infra Sandbox

How does it stack up against its Sandboxes & Runtimes neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-08-17 · 2d ago

Recent change

Rank +6

Is Agent Infra Sandbox safe? Agent Infra Sandbox scores 53.6/100 (Grade C), ranked #442 of 1308 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.7/10; 79% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-17. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Sandboxes & Runtimes

#3 Daytona — 66.5 (B) → #4 Container Use — 60.4 (C) → #6 OpenSandbox — 47.8 (D) → #7 Cube Sandbox — 46.4 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-08-19

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#428 → #442)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 38 spots (#465 → #427)

2026-08-17

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 3.6pts (50.1 → 53.7)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.7/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Compare with BoxLite Get email alerts for Agent Infra Sandbox View Sandboxes & Runtimes Report missing data

63.9

Activity sub-score · out of 100

In Sandboxes & Runtimes

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-19

Activity & Reach

Stars

5.7k

Forks

515

Last Push

2026-08-17

2 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼14

was #428

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Sandboxes & Runtimes

53.6 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Agent Infra Sandbox Sandboxes & Runtimes average (10 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

9.8 / 25

0.6 below avg 10.4

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.7 below avg 11.5

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

12.5 / 17

in line with avg 12.5

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

12.5 / 20

3.1 below avg 15.6

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

9.0 / 20

2.2 below avg 11.2

Activity Inputs

63.9 / 100

StarsRepository reach

22.6 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.7 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

3.8 / 25

CommunityFork signal

12.6 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

4.7 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 18, 2026

Signed Commits

79%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 3

CI-Tests 7

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 7

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 2

SAST 6

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Is Agent Infra Sandbox safe?

Public trust evidence for Agent Infra Sandbox is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does Agent Infra Sandbox publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Agent Infra Sandbox. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Agent Infra Sandbox have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Agent Infra Sandbox has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.7/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Agent Infra Sandbox actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 2 day(s).

What license does Agent Infra Sandbox use?

Agent Infra Sandbox ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Agent Infra Sandbox's commits signed?

79% of the last 100 commits to Agent Infra Sandbox are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Compare Agent Infra Sandbox head-to-head

Agent Infra Sandbox vs BoxLite → Agent Infra Sandbox vs E2B → Agent Infra Sandbox vs Daytona →

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

medium confidence

Declared

MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

OpenAI

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Agent Infra Sandbox's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-12

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none

Maintain Agent Infra Sandbox?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Agent Infra Sandbox from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-19

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#428 → #442)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 38 spots (#465 → #427)

2026-08-17

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 3.6pts (50.1 → 53.7)

2026-08-17

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 10pts (54 → 64)

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#438 → #453)

2026-08-12

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 18 spots (#456 → #438)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#439 → #455)

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 109 spots (#323 → #432)

2026-08-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#298 → #308)

2026-07-29

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 4.7/10

2026-07-29

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-07-29

Rank Moved

Rank rose 132 spots (#430 → #298)

2026-07-29

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 31.6pts (20.6 → 52.2)

2026-07-28

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #430

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/agent-infra-sandbox.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/agent-infra-sandbox)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/agent-infra-sandbox"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/agent-infra-sandbox.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Sandboxes & Runtimes

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON