Is Agent Infra Sandbox safe to use?

Agent Infra Sandbox has an HVTrust score of 50.7/100 (Grade C), ranked #993 of 1378 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Agent Infra Sandbox?

Agent Infra Sandbox scores 50.7/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 6.2k GitHub stars and is categorized under Sandboxes & Runtimes.

Agent Infra Sandbox

Repository Website

All-in-One Sandbox for AI Agents that combines Browser, Shell, File, MCP and VSCode Server in a single Docker container.

Sandboxes & Runtimes Python Listed Apache-2.0

Is Agent Infra Sandbox safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10

Provenance None

Signed commits 83%

Last push 37d ago

Compare Agent Infra Sandbox

How does it stack up against its Sandboxes & Runtimes neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: Agent Infra Sandbox scores 50.7/100 (Grade C), ranked #993 of 1378 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.6/10; 83% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-14. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Agent Infra Sandbox could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Raise the OSSF Scorecard from 4.6 to 9.0lowest checks: CII-Best-Practices 0, Dependency-Update-Tool 0, Fuzzing 0 +9.2 → 59.9 C · #6 of 12
Sign every commit83% signed today +0.9 → 51.6 C · #11 of 12

Already done? Suggest a correction Add the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Agent Infra Sandbox and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

Source Signed

github.com/agent-infra/sandbox, Apache-2.0, last pushed 2026-09-14. 83% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature, so changes trace to a verified account.
Review and release Mixed

OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 4.6/10 (scanned Oct 21, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:
- Code Review5
- Branch Protection3
- Signed Releasesn/a
- Dangerous Workflow10
- Token Permissions0
- Pinned Dependencies2
All 18 Scorecard checks

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 3

CI-Tests 7

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 5

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 2

SAST 7

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0
Published packages None

No registry package. Agent Infra Sandbox is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.

Changes to this chain

2026-07-29 OSSF Scorecard: 4.7/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.

GitHub repository data
Package downloads (missing)
Supply-chain checks
Public actions (missing)
Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Agent Infra Sandbox’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How Agent Infra Sandbox compares in Sandboxes & Runtimes

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Agent Infra Sandbox’s 50.7.

Where the 50.7 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Sandboxes & Runtimes average

50.7 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Agent Infra Sandbox Sandboxes & Runtimes average (12 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

9.9 / 25

in line with avg 10.2

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.6 below avg 11.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

12.4 / 17

in line with avg 12.1

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

9.5 / 20

5.8 below avg 15.3

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

9.1 / 20

3.2 below avg 12.3

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-10-17

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#969 → #979)

2026-10-14

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 40 spots (#917 → #957)

2026-10-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 37 spots (#880 → #917)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.6/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 37 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Agent Infra Sandbox View Sandboxes & Runtimes Report missing data

55.5

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#11

In Sandboxes & Runtimes

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-21

Activity & Reach

Stars

6.2k

Forks

561

Last Push

2026-09-14

37 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼6

was #987

Analysis

Activity Inputs

55.5 / 100

StarsRepository reach

22.8 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

19.9 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

0.0 / 25

CommunityFork signal

12.8 / 20

Common questions about Agent Infra Sandbox

Public trust evidence for Agent Infra Sandbox is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does Agent Infra Sandbox publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Agent Infra Sandbox. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Agent Infra Sandbox have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Agent Infra Sandbox has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.6/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Agent Infra Sandbox actively maintained?

Slowing down. Last push was 37 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.

What license does Agent Infra Sandbox use?

Agent Infra Sandbox ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Agent Infra Sandbox's commits signed?

83% of the last 100 commits to Agent Infra Sandbox are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

medium confidence

Declared

MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

OpenAI

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Agent Infra Sandbox's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-12

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none

Maintain Agent Infra Sandbox?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Agent Infra Sandbox from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-10-17

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#969 → #979)

2026-10-14

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 40 spots (#917 → #957)

2026-10-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 37 spots (#880 → #917)

2026-10-11

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 26 spots (#850 → #876)

2026-10-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 24 spots (#826 → #850)

2026-10-09

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#810 → #826)

2026-10-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#785 → #795)

2026-09-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#747 → #761)

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 447 spots (#300 → #747)

2026-09-21

Rank Moved

Rank rose 504 spots (#798 → #294)

2026-09-20

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#788 → #798)

2026-09-10

Rank Moved

Rank rose 16 spots (#797 → #781)

2026-09-09

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#784 → #797)

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 43 spots (#733 → #776)

2026-09-06

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#722 → #733)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 70 spots (#652 → #722)

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 25 spots (#627 → #652)

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 38 spots (#589 → #627)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 21 spots (#573 → #594)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 30 spots (#543 → #573)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 29 spots (#511 → #540)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#494 → #505)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 59 spots (#435 → #494)

2026-08-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#425 → #441)

2026-08-22

Rank Moved

Rank rose 17 spots (#444 → #427)

2026-08-19

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#428 → #442)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 38 spots (#465 → #427)

2026-08-17

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 3.6pts (50.1 → 53.7)

2026-08-17

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 10pts (54 → 64)

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#438 → #453)

2026-08-12

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 18 spots (#456 → #438)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#439 → #455)

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 109 spots (#323 → #432)

2026-08-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#298 → #308)

2026-07-29

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 4.7/10

2026-07-29

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-07-29

Rank Moved

Rank rose 132 spots (#430 → #298)

2026-07-29

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 31.6pts (20.6 → 52.2)

2026-07-28

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #430

GitHub → Website →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/agent-infra-sandbox.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/agent-infra-sandbox)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/agent-infra-sandbox"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/agent-infra-sandbox.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Sandboxes & Runtimes

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON

Agent Infra Sandbox

How Agent Infra Sandbox could raise its score

Chain of custody

Source Signed

Review and release Mixed

Published packages None

Changes to this chain

Evidence behind this score

Verify this score yourself

What this score doesn’t check

How Agent Infra Sandbox compares in Sandboxes & Runtimes

Where the 50.7 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Sandboxes & Runtimes average

Quick Trust Read

Rank Trend

Activity & Reach

Analysis

Activity Inputs

Common questions about Agent Infra Sandbox

AI agent surface

Maintain Agent Infra Sandbox?

Reputation Timeline

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

Other agents in Sandboxes & Runtimes