RegistryCompare › Agent Infra Sandbox vs Daytona

Agent Infra Sandbox vs Daytona

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agent Infra Sandbox and Daytona, two Sandboxes & Runtimes projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Daytona leads on trust — 66.7/100 (Grade B) vs 50.2/100 (Grade C), a 16.5-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Agent Infra Sandboxagent-infra/sandbox Daytonadaytonaio/daytona
HVTrust score 50.2 66.7
Evidence grade C B
Coverage grade C A
Overall rank #442 #181
Rank in Sandboxes & Runtimes #5 #3
GitHub stars 5.7k 72.0k
Last updated 44d ago 22d ago
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10 5.3 / 10
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Downloads 210k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 9.8 11.6
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.5 13.0
Maintenance / 20 9.1 10.5
Adoption / 20 9.0 18.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared Implemented
External providers 1 — OpenAI
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Unknown
Open in the live compare tool → Agent Infra Sandbox profile Daytona profile More Sandboxes & Runtimes →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →