RegistryCompare › Agent Infra Sandbox vs Daytona

Agent Infra Sandbox vs Daytona

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agent Infra Sandbox and Daytona, two Sandboxes & Runtimes projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Daytona leads on trust — 64.1/100 (Grade C) vs 50.6/100 (Grade C), a 13.5-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Agent Infra Sandboxagent-infra/sandbox Daytonadaytonaio/daytona
HVTrust score 50.6 64.1
Evidence grade C C
Coverage grade C A
Overall rank #308 #166
Rank in Sandboxes & Runtimes #5 #3
GitHub stars 5.6k 72.0k
Last updated 33d ago 11d ago
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10 5.3 / 10
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Downloads 248k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 9.8 11.6
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.5 13.0
Maintenance / 20 9.8 11.3
Adoption / 20 9.0 18.9
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared Implemented
External providers 1 — OpenAI 3 — OpenAI, Postgres, Redis
Requires API keys Yes Yes
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Unknown
Open in the live compare tool → Agent Infra Sandbox profile Daytona profile More Sandboxes & Runtimes →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →