RegistryCompare › Agent Infra Sandbox vs Cube Sandbox

Agent Infra Sandbox vs Cube Sandbox

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agent Infra Sandbox and Cube Sandbox, two Sandboxes & Runtimes projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Agent Infra Sandbox leads on trust — 50.2/100 (Grade C) vs 46.2/100 (Grade D), a 4.0-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Agent Infra Sandboxagent-infra/sandbox Cube SandboxTencentCloud/CubeSandbox
HVTrust score 50.2 46.2
Evidence grade C D
Coverage grade C C
Overall rank #441 #499
Rank in Sandboxes & Runtimes #5 #7
GitHub stars 5.7k 11.1k
Last updated 44d ago 1d ago
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10 5.0 / 10
License Apache-2.0 NOASSERTION
Downloads
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 9.8 10.6
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.5 12.8
Maintenance / 20 9.1 19.9
Adoption / 20 9.0 9.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared
External providers 1 — OpenAI
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → Agent Infra Sandbox profile Cube Sandbox profile More Sandboxes & Runtimes →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →