Best Open-Source Multi-Agent Systems: AIPass vs OpenMausBot
A data-backed comparison of the top two multi-agent systems on HVTracker, built from public trust signals rather than stars alone.
Short answer: AIPass currently leads OpenMausBot on HVTracker's evidence-weighted trust score: 85.5 vs 83.8/100. This is not a popularity ranking; it combines supply-chain safety, identity/provenance, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.
AIPass
Persistent Agent Workspace — AI agents that remember, collaborate, and never start from zero.
OpenMausBot
Open-source Grok Bot alternative with a virtual machine that bots can use
AIPass vs OpenMausBot: trust signal breakdown
Both projects are tracked in the Multi-Agent Systems category, but they do not expose the same evidence. The table below compares the public signals that feed HVTrust.
| Signal | AIPass | OpenMausBot |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 85.5 | 83.8 |
| Safety / Integrity | 21.6/25 | 14.4/25 |
| Identity / Provenance | 18.0/18 | 18.0/18 |
| Transparency | 14.7/17 | 12.1/17 |
| Maintenance | 20.0/20 | 20.0/20 |
| Adoption | 9.0/20 | 13.3/20 |
| OSSF Scorecard | 7.3 | 4.2 |
| Signed commits | 100% | 33% |
| Package provenance | Verified | Verified |
Which one should you evaluate first?
If your priority is the most verifiable trust profile today, start with AIPass. It has the stronger current HVTrust score and ranks higher in Multi-Agent Systems. If your use case depends on a specific runtime, language, license, or integration model, use the individual profiles rather than the headline score alone.
For production use, the practical checklist is: inspect the security policy, confirm package provenance or release signing where available, review recent maintenance cadence, and compare the exact trust breakdown. HVTracker is meant to reduce the first-pass research burden, not replace your own risk review.