Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange

Zscaler Integration MCP Server is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server designed for managing Several Zscaler Products using Large Language Models (LLMs).

MCP Servers Python Listed MIT

Is Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 3.9 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 0%
Last push 14d ago
Compare Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Suggest a correction

In detail: Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange scores 47.8/100 (Grade D), ranked #1070 of 1374 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.9/10; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-10-27. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Unsigned

    github.com/zscaler/zscaler-mcp-server, MIT, last pushed 2026-10-27. None of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature, so no change traces to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Weak

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 3.9/10 (scanned Nov 7, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review0
    • Branch Protection0
    • Signed Releases8
    • Dangerous Workflow0
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies5
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 0
    CI-Tests -1
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 0
    Contributors 10
    Dangerous-Workflow 0
    Dependency-Update-Tool 10
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 9
    Packaging 10
    Pinned-Dependencies 5
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 0
    Signed-Releases 8
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 0
  3. Published packages Not linked

    • PyPI zscaler-mcp Source link isn't a GitHub repo No build attestation

    Without a build attestation, nothing proves the published files were built from this repository.

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-08-27 OSSF Scorecard: 4.8/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange compares in MCP Servers

  1. #602 Ryaker Appstore Connect MCP 48.0 +0.2
  2. #603 Kylas CRM 47.9 +0.1
  3. #604 Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange 47.8 this agent
  4. #605 Cortex Gateway 47.7 −0.1
  5. #606 Mistral MCP 47.7 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange’s 47.8.

Where the 47.8 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

47.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
4.9 / 25
5.9 below avg 10.8
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.9 below avg 13.7
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.8 / 17
0.5 below avg 12.3
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
11.1 / 20
1.1 below avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
10.0 / 20
2.4 above avg 7.6

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-11-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#1059 → #1070)
2026-10-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#1032 → #1046)
2026-10-28
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.9/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Compare with another agent
View MCP Servers Report missing data
40.9
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#604

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-11-10 04:07 UTC · Repo last pushed 14 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-11-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
55
Forks
34
Last Push
2026-10-27
14 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
20,974
docker+pypi
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
4
Rank Change
▲4
was #1074

Analysis

Activity Inputs

40.9 / 100
StarsRepository reach
10.5 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
23.1 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
7.2 / 20

Common questions about Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange

Public trust evidence for Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.9/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 14 days ago.
What license does Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange use?
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange's commits signed?
0% of the last 100 commits to Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
4 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
low confidence
Unknown
Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 37Grade 14HVTrust 2Scorecard 1Score 1Delisted 1Listed 1MCP 1Surface 1Surface 1
2026-11-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#1059 → #1070)
2026-10-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#1032 → #1046)
2026-10-28
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
2026-10-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 49 spots (#983 → #1032)
2026-10-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 23 spots (#1004 → #981)
2026-10-16
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-10-16
Rank Moved
Rank rose 60 spots (#1034 → #974)
2026-10-15
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
2026-10-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 75 spots (#959 → #1034)
2026-10-14
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-10-14
Rank Moved
Rank rose 65 spots (#1024 → #959)
2026-10-13
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
2026-10-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 72 spots (#952 → #1024)
2026-10-10
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-10-10
Rank Moved
Rank rose 56 spots (#1006 → #950)
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#983 → #1006)
2026-10-05
Rank Moved
Rank rose 15 spots (#1002 → #987)
2026-10-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#979 → #996)
2026-10-01
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
2026-10-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 59 spots (#918 → #977)
2026-09-30
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 43 spots (#961 → #918)
2026-09-28
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
2026-09-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 59 spots (#900 → #959)
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#888 → #901)
2026-09-24
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-24
Rank Moved
Rank rose 53 spots (#941 → #888)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 96 spots (#1037 → #941)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 25.5pts (24.0 → 49.5)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1037
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-18
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
2026-09-18
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 45 spots (#911 → #956)
2026-09-18
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 6pts (47 → 41)
2026-09-17
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#923 → #911)
2026-09-15
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
2026-09-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#910 → #922)
2026-09-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#890 → #910)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#876 → #890)
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 48 spots (#823 → #871)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 65 spots (#758 → #823)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#743 → #758)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#717 → #743)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 74 spots (#643 → #717)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#617 → #643)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 37 spots (#580 → #617)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 29 spots (#551 → #580)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#540 → #551)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#505 → #540)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#485 → #509)
2026-08-27
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.8/10
2026-08-27
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank rose 417 spots (#895 → #478)
2026-08-27
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 25.2pts (29.7 → 54.9)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 112 spots (#783 → #895)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#764 → #780)

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 47.8 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/zscaler-zero-trust-exchange.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/zscaler-zero-trust-exchange)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/zscaler-zero-trust-exchange"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/zscaler-zero-trust-exchange.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON