updated 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC

World Model MCP

SaravananJaichandar/world-model-mcp

Temporal knowledge graph + authenticated audit chain for AI coding agents. Prevents hallucinations, repeated mistakes, r

MCP Servers Python Grade C Listed MIT
64.9/100
Rank #231 of 1283
Compare World Model MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-02 · 10d ago
Recent change
Grade Changed +2

Is World Model MCP safe? World Model MCP scores 64.9/100 (Grade C), ranked #231 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-02. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#68 Sec Edgar MCP — 65.0 (B) → #69 1password MCP — 65.0 (B) → #71 Google Workspace MCP — 64.6 (C) → #72 Satelliteoflove Godot MCP — 64.6 (C) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-08-12
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → C
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#209 → #229)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #202
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for World Model MCP View MCP Servers Report missing data
58.0
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#70
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC · Repo last pushed 10 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars
22
Forks
4
Last Push
2026-08-02
10 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
65
Downloads (7d)
429
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
=
was #231

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

64.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

World Model MCP MCP Servers average (761 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
12.5 / 25
7.5 above avg 5.0
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.7 above avg 13.3
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
8.5 / 17
in line with avg 8.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
18.6 / 20
6.2 above avg 12.4
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
6.8 / 20
1.0 above avg 5.8

Activity Inputs

58.0 / 100
StarsRepository reach
8.2 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
23.6 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
22.7 / 25
CommunityFork signal
3.3 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
pypi attestation
OSSF Scorecard
—
Not available
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified

Is World Model MCP safe?

World Model MCP has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does World Model MCP publish package provenance?
Yes. World Model MCP's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does World Model MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for World Model MCP. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is World Model MCP actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 10 days ago.
What license does World Model MCP use?
World Model MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are World Model MCP's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to World Model MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
World Model MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
2 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
low confidence
Unknown
Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain World Model MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores World Model MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Listed 1Rank 1Grade 1
2026-08-12
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → C
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#209 → #229)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #202
GitHub → PyPI: world-model-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 64.9 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/world-model-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/world-model-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/world-model-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/world-model-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON