Studio MCP

MCP Servers Go Grade C Listed Apache-2.0
62.7/100
Rank #502 of 1328
Compare Studio MCP

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-19 · 20d ago
Recent change
Rank +10

Is Studio MCP safe? Studio MCP scores 62.7/100 (Grade C), ranked #502 of 1328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 6.0/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-19. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 33 spots (#463 → #496)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#428 → #463)
2026-09-05
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 6.0/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
42.4
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#274

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-08 14:33 UTC · Repo last pushed 20 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-08

Activity & Reach

Stars
55
Forks
16
Last Push
2026-08-19
20 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
1
Downloads (7d)
574,044
npm
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
▼6
was #496

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

62.7 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Studio MCP MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
12.5 / 25
2.6 above avg 9.9
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.6 below avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.6 / 17
1.6 above avg 12.0
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
11.9 / 20
in line with avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
11.9 / 20
5.0 above avg 6.9

Activity Inputs

42.4 / 100
StarsRepository reach
10.5 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
22.2 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
3.8 / 25
CommunityFork signal
5.7 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
6.0 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 2, 2026
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 5
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 9
Contributors 3
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 10
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 10
SAST 0
Security-Policy 9
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is Studio MCP safe?

Studio MCP has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Studio MCP publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Studio MCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Studio MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Studio MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 6.0/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Studio MCP actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 20 days ago.
What license does Studio MCP use?
Studio MCP ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Studio MCP's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to Studio MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Studio MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
low confidence
Unknown
Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Studio MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Studio MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 17HVTrust 2Listed 1Scorecard 1Grade 1
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 33 spots (#463 → #496)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#428 → #463)
2026-09-05
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank rose 660 spots (#1088 → #428)
2026-09-05
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 25.4pts (38.3 → 63.7)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#1066 → #1088)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 38 spots (#1028 → #1066)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 45 spots (#983 → #1028)
2026-09-01
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 6.0/10
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank rose 281 spots (#1264 → #983)
2026-09-01
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 19.2pts (18.4 → 37.6)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#1253 → #1264)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#1242 → #1253)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#1226 → #1242)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#1209 → #1226)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#1191 → #1209)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 44 spots (#1147 → #1191)
2026-08-20
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#1139 → #1150)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank rose 14 spots (#1153 → #1139)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#1133 → #1160)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 66 spots (#1061 → #1127)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1059

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 62.7 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/studio-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/studio-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/studio-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/studio-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON