Anilist MCP

AniList MCP server for accessing anime and manga data

MCP Servers TypeScript Grade D Listed MIT
44.5/100
Rank #922 of 1320
Compare Anilist MCP

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-07-13 · 53d ago
Recent change
Rank +7

Is Anilist MCP safe? Anilist MCP scores 44.5/100 (Grade D), ranked #922 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.4/10; 98% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-07-13. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Expose more independent signals, such as package metadata, provenance, or public usage evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#907 → #922)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 49 spots (#858 → #907)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 42 spots (#816 → #858)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.4/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 53 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
34.8
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#504

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-04 13:03 UTC · Repo last pushed 53 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars
85
Forks
15
Last Push
2026-07-13
53 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
▼15
was #907

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

44.5 / 100 · 67.0% confidence

Anilist MCP MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
16.7 / 25
7.2 above avg 9.5
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.6 above avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.4 / 17
in line with avg 11.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
8.5 / 20
3.7 below avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
4.6 / 20
1.6 below avg 6.2

Activity Inputs

34.8 / 100
StarsRepository reach
11.6 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
17.6 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
5.6 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
npm attestation
OSSF Scorecard
3.4 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 30, 2026
Signed Commits
98%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 3
CI-Tests 0
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 0
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 8
Vulnerabilities 0

Is Anilist MCP safe?

Public trust evidence for Anilist MCP is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Anilist MCP publish package provenance?
Yes. Anilist MCP's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Anilist MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Anilist MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.4/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Anilist MCP actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 53 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does Anilist MCP use?
Anilist MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Anilist MCP's commits signed?
98% of the last 100 commits to Anilist MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Anilist MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
low confidence
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Anilist MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Anilist MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 11Listed 1HVTrust 1Scorecard 1
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#907 → #922)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 49 spots (#858 → #907)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 42 spots (#816 → #858)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#786 → #816)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 36 spots (#750 → #786)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#724 → #750)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 47 spots (#677 → #724)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#651 → #677)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#630 → #651)
2026-08-26
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.4/10
2026-08-26
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 4.8pts (40.1 → 44.9)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#595 → #608)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#572 → #595)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #568

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 44.5 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/anilist-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/anilist-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/anilist-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/anilist-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON