Webarena

Code repo for "WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents"

Observability & Evaluation Python Grade D Listed Apache-2.0
36.3/100
Rank #678 of 1283
Compare Webarena

How does it stack up against its Observability & Evaluation neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2025-11-26 · 262d ago
Recent change
Rank +1

Is Webarena safe? Webarena scores 36.3/100 (Grade D), ranked #678 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.9/10; 49% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2025-11-26. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Observability & Evaluation

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 28 spots (#652 → #680)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 246 spots (#404 → #650)
2026-07-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#388 → #398)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.9/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 262 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
30.3
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#21

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-15 10:11 UTC · Repo last pushed 262 days ago — may be stale

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-15

Activity & Reach

Stars
1.6k
Forks
244
Last Push
2025-11-26
262 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
82
Rank Change
▲3
was #681

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Observability & Evaluation

36.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Webarena Observability & Evaluation average (23 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
7.3 / 25
3.6 below avg 10.9
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.2 below avg 13.0
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.8 / 17
in line with avg 11.9
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
0 / 20
15.1 below avg 15.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
7.7 / 20
6.2 below avg 13.9

Activity Inputs

30.3 / 100
StarsRepository reach
19.2 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
0.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
11.1 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
3.9 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 15, 2026
Signed Commits
49%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 6
CI-Tests 6
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 10
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 0
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is Webarena safe?

Public trust evidence for Webarena is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Webarena publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Webarena. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Webarena have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Webarena has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.9/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Webarena actively maintained?
Stale. The repository has not been pushed to in 262 days. Consider whether the project is still being maintained.
What license does Webarena use?
Webarena ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Webarena's commits signed?
49% of the last 100 commits to Webarena are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
1 tags
Broad capability areas detected.
  • browser
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Webarena?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Webarena from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 13Listed 1Score 1HVTrust 1Scorecard 1
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 28 spots (#652 → #680)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 246 spots (#404 → #650)
2026-07-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#388 → #398)
2026-07-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#360 → #385)
2026-07-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#341 → #360)
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 36 spots (#305 → #341)
2026-06-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#262 → #297)
2026-06-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#239 → #262)
2026-06-22
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#228 → #239)
2026-06-21
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#212 → #228)
2026-06-18
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#193 → #205)
2026-06-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#159 → #173)
2026-06-01
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.2/10
2026-06-01
Rank Moved
Rank rose 31 spots (#190 → #159)
2026-06-01
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 38.2pts (0.0 → 38.2)
2026-06-01
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 30pts (0 → 30)
2026-05-31
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #190

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 36.3 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/webarena.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/webarena)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/webarena"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/webarena.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Observability & Evaluation

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON