Is agentacct safe to use?

agentacct has an HVTrust score of 54.9/100 (Grade C), ranked #777 of 1328 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for agentacct?

agentacct scores 54.9/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 737 GitHub stars and is categorized under Observability & Evaluation.

agentacct

mikehasa/agentacct

See what your coding agents did and what it cost. Breaks each task down into work steps — tools used, files changed, tes

Observability & Evaluation Python Grade C Listed MIT

54.9/100

Rank #777 of 1328

Compare agentacct

How does it stack up against its Observability & Evaluation neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-09-19 · 2d ago

Recent change

Rank +1

Is agentacct safe? agentacct scores 54.9/100 (Grade C), ranked #777 of 1328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.5/10; 28% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-19. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Observability & Evaluation

#15 Traceroot — 62.1 (C) → #16 OpenLIT — 60.2 (C) → #18 AgentOps — 54.5 (C) → #19 TruLens — 46.5 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-20

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 59 spots (#723 → #782)

2026-09-16

Rank Moved

Rank rose 27 spots (#763 → #736)

2026-09-10

Rank Moved

Rank rose 25 spots (#771 → #746)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.5/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for agentacct View Observability & Evaluation Report missing data

75.9

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#17

In Observability & Evaluation

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-21

Activity & Reach

Stars

737

Forks

Last Push

2026-09-19

2 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

325

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▲5

was #782

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Observability & Evaluation

54.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

agentacct Observability & Evaluation average (23 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

5.8 / 25

6.1 below avg 11.9

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

2.5 below avg 13.3

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

11.5 / 17

0.9 below avg 12.4

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

19.9 / 20

5.0 above avg 14.9

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

6.9 / 20

6.8 below avg 13.7

Activity Inputs

75.9 / 100

StarsRepository reach

17.2 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.7 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

25 / 25

CommunityFork signal

8.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

3.5 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 17, 2026

Signed Commits

28%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 0

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 0

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 4

Signed-Releases 0

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 10

Is agentacct safe?

Public trust evidence for agentacct is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does agentacct publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for agentacct. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does agentacct have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

agentacct has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is agentacct actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 2 day(s).

What license does agentacct use?

agentacct ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are agentacct's commits signed?

28% of the last 100 commits to agentacct are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

None detected

No MCP server signal detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain agentacct?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores agentacct from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-20

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 59 spots (#723 → #782)

2026-09-16

Rank Moved

Rank rose 27 spots (#763 → #736)

2026-09-10

Rank Moved

Rank rose 25 spots (#771 → #746)

2026-09-09

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 17 spots (#754 → #771)

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 48 spots (#699 → #747)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 75 spots (#615 → #690)

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 21 spots (#594 → #615)

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 118 spots (#476 → #594)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#465 → #476)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#451 → #465)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 33 spots (#418 → #451)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank rose 16 spots (#434 → #418)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#419 → #434)

2026-08-26

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 3.5/10

2026-08-26

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank rose 428 spots (#836 → #408)

2026-08-26

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 32.8pts (25.3 → 58.1)

2026-08-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#826 → #836)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#822 → #840)

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 11 spots (#825 → #814)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 46 spots (#779 → #825)

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 333 spots (#442 → #775)

2026-08-06

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #487

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/agentacct.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/agentacct)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/agentacct"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/agentacct.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Observability & Evaluation

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON