updated 2026-08-11 20:02 UTC

agentacct

mikehasa/agentacct

See what your coding agents did and what it cost. Breaks each task down into work steps — tools used, files changed, tes

Observability & Evaluation Python Grade D Listed MIT
25.2/100
Rank #825 of 1283
Compare agentacct

How does it stack up against its Observability & Evaluation neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade D · 1/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-11 · 0d ago
Recent change
Rank +2

Is agentacct safe? agentacct scores 25.2/100 (Grade D), ranked #825 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage D (1 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 92% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-11. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Observability & Evaluation

#19 TruLens — 44.4 (D) → #20 AgentBench — 37.3 (D) → #21 Webarena — 36.3 (D) → #23 SimWorld — 17.9 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 46 spots (#779 → #825)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 333 spots (#442 → #775)
2026-08-06
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #487
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for agentacct View Observability & Evaluation Report missing data
74.8
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#22
In Observability & Evaluation

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage D is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (1 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-11 20:02 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Activity & Reach

Stars
583
Forks
69
Last Push
2026-08-11
today
Commits (4 wk)
93
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
=
was #825

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Observability & Evaluation

25.2 / 100 · 50.0% confidence

agentacct Observability & Evaluation average (23 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
4.6 / 25
6.2 below avg 10.8
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.2 below avg 13.0
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
8.5 / 17
3.4 below avg 11.9
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
19.9 / 20
4.8 above avg 15.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
6.6 / 20
7.3 below avg 13.9

Activity Inputs

74.8 / 100
StarsRepository reach
16.6 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
24.6 / 25
CommunityFork signal
8.6 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
—
Not available
Signed Commits
92%
of last 100 commits verified

Is agentacct safe?

Public trust evidence for agentacct is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does agentacct publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for agentacct. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does agentacct have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for agentacct. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is agentacct actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does agentacct use?
agentacct ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are agentacct's commits signed?
92% of the last 100 commits to agentacct are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain agentacct?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores agentacct from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 2Listed 1
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 46 spots (#779 → #825)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 333 spots (#442 → #775)
2026-08-06
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #487
GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 25.2 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/agentacct.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/agentacct)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/agentacct"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/agentacct.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Observability & Evaluation

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON