Is Video Shotcraft safe to use?

Video Shotcraft has an HVTrust score of 53.3/100 (Grade C), ranked #190 of 351 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Video Shotcraft?

Video Shotcraft scores 53.3/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 9.6k GitHub stars and is categorized under Agent Skills.

Video Shotcraft

Vincentwei1021/video-shotcraft

AI video skill for Claude Code & Codex — cinematic product videos with Remotion: 152 shot recipe cards, 209 motion previews, a production-ready template

Agent Skills TypeScript Listed Apache-2.0

Is Video Shotcraft safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 2.8 / 10

Provenance None

Signed commits 47%

Last push 3d ago

Compare Video Shotcraft

How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: Video Shotcraft scores 53.3/100 (Grade C), ranked #190 of 351 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.8/10; 47% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-23. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Video Shotcraft compares in Agent Skills

#188 Claude Code Skills Zh 53.3 ±0
#189 Power Bi Agentic Development 53.3 ±0
#190 Video Shotcraft 53.3 this agent
#191 Nagisanzenin Engram 53.2 −0.1
#192 Baoyu Design 52.9 −0.4

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Video Shotcraft’s 53.3.

Where the 53.3 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

53.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Video Shotcraft Agent Skills average (351 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

5.8 / 25

2.3 below avg 8.1

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.6 below avg 11.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

10.9 / 17

1.3 below avg 12.2

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

16.5 / 20

2.3 above avg 14.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

9.6 / 20

0.6 above avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#173 → #189)

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 2.8/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Video Shotcraft View Agent Skills Report missing data

77.0

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#190

In Agent Skills

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars

9.6k

Forks

868

Last Push

2026-09-23

3 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼1

was #189

Analysis

Activity Inputs

77.0 / 100

StarsRepository reach

23.9 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.6 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

14.7 / 25

CommunityFork signal

13.7 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

2.8 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 25, 2026

Signed Commits

47%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 3

CI-Tests 6

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 3

Contributors 3

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 0

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 2

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases 0

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about Video Shotcraft

Public trust evidence for Video Shotcraft is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does Video Shotcraft publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Video Shotcraft. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Video Shotcraft have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Video Shotcraft has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 2.8/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Video Shotcraft actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 3 day(s).

What license does Video Shotcraft use?

Video Shotcraft ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Video Shotcraft's commits signed?

46% of the last 100 commits to Video Shotcraft are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

None detected

No MCP server signal detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

medium confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Anthropic

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Video Shotcraft's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

Maintain Video Shotcraft?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Video Shotcraft from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#173 → #189)

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-23

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 41 spots (#124 → #165)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 11.5pts (42.3 → 53.8)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #124

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 31 spots (#119 → #150)

2026-09-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#108 → #123)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#89 → #103)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#75 → #86)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#63 → #75)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#51 → #63)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#39 → #51)

2026-08-26

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 3.9/10

2026-08-26

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank rose 47 spots (#78 → #31)

2026-08-26

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 31.7pts (23.5 → 55.2)

2026-08-11

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #62

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/video-shotcraft.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/video-shotcraft)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/video-shotcraft"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/video-shotcraft.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON