Vaaya

Vaaya MCP server — pay-per-call agent superpowers: media & video generation, product demo videos, web search & scraping,

MCP Servers JavaScript Grade D Listed MIT
35.7/100
Rank #1123 of 1320
Compare Vaaya

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-09-03 · 1d ago
Recent change
Rank +6

Is Vaaya safe? Vaaya scores 35.7/100 (Grade D), ranked #1123 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.9/10; 15% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-03. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 42 spots (#1075 → #1117)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 43 spots (#1032 → #1075)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 44 spots (#988 → #1032)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.9/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
49.5
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#646

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-04 13:33 UTC · Repo last pushed yesterday

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars
42
Forks
7
Last Push
2026-09-03
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
6?
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
4
Rank Change
▼6
was #1117

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

35.7 / 100 · 67.0% confidence

Vaaya MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
5.6 / 25
3.9 below avg 9.5
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.6 below avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.8 / 17
in line with avg 11.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
13.6 / 20
1.4 above avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
3.9 / 20
2.3 below avg 6.2

Activity Inputs

49.5 / 100
StarsRepository reach
9.8 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
10.5 / 25
CommunityFork signal
4.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
3.9 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 4, 2026
Signed Commits
15%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests 0
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 1
Contributors 3
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 0
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 10
Vulnerabilities 10

Is Vaaya safe?

Public trust evidence for Vaaya is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Vaaya publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Vaaya. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Vaaya have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Vaaya has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.9/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Vaaya actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Vaaya use?
Vaaya ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Vaaya's commits signed?
15% of the last 100 commits to Vaaya are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Vaaya appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
2 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Vaaya?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Vaaya from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 14Listed 1Score 1HVTrust 1Scorecard 1
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 42 spots (#1075 → #1117)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 43 spots (#1032 → #1075)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 44 spots (#988 → #1032)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#953 → #988)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 42 spots (#911 → #953)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 51 spots (#860 → #911)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 29 spots (#831 → #860)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#811 → #831)
2026-08-26
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.9/10
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 262 spots (#1073 → #811)
2026-08-26
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 15.4pts (20.2 → 35.6)
2026-08-25
Rank Moved
Rank rose 39 spots (#1112 → #1073)
2026-08-25
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 7pts (40 → 48)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#1061 → #1092)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#1055 → #1065)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#1067 → #1055)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 61 spots (#1001 → #1062)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #990

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 35.7 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/vaaya.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/vaaya)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/vaaya"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/vaaya.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON