Vaaya
Paid APIs and supported tokenized shares for agents, funded with prepaid balance. Instinct Checkout guidance: https://vaaya.ai/llms.txt
Is Vaaya safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
Compare Vaaya
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Vaaya scores 54.8/100 (Grade C), ranked #792 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.9/10; 15% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-13. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Vaaya compares in MCP Servers
- #438 Pagerduty MCP Server 54.8 ±0
- #439 Paper Distill MCP 54.8 ±0
- #440 Vaaya 54.8 this agent
- #441 Gmc MCP 54.8 ±0
- #442 Fr24api MCP 54.7 −0.1
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Vaaya’s 54.8.
Where the 54.8 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
54.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceVaaya MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
48.9 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about Vaaya
Does Vaaya publish package provenance?
Does Vaaya have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Vaaya actively maintained?
What license does Vaaya use?
Are Vaaya's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Vaaya's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Vaaya?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Vaaya from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/vaaya)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/vaaya"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/vaaya.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON