Ui Annotator MCP

MCP server that annotates any web page with hover labels — zero extensions, works in any browser

MCP Servers JavaScript Listed MIT

Is Ui Annotator MCP safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 3.7 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 0%
Last push 186d ago
Compare Ui Annotator MCP
Suggest a correction

In detail: Ui Annotator MCP scores 38.0/100 (Grade D), ranked #1197 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.7/10; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-03-24. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Ui Annotator MCP compares in MCP Servers

  1. #712 Augments MCP Server 38.4 +0.4
  2. #713 Paypal MCP Server 38.3 +0.3
  3. #714 Ui Annotator MCP 38.0 this agent
  4. #715 Hummingbot MCP 38.0 ±0
  5. #716 MCP Codebase Index 38.0 ±0

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Ui Annotator MCP’s 38.0.

Where the 38.0 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

38.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Ui Annotator MCP MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
4.6 / 25
5.7 below avg 10.3
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.6 below avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.6 / 17
0.6 below avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
0 / 20
12.1 below avg 12.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
5.3 / 20
1.9 below avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#1171 → #1197)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.7/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 186 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
10.8
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#714

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 20:12 UTC · Repo last pushed 186 days ago — may be stale

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
17
Forks
4
Last Push
2026-03-24
186 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
51
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
▲5
was #1202

Analysis

Activity Inputs

10.8 / 100
StarsRepository reach
7.5 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
0.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
3.3 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
3.7 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 25, 2026
Signed Commits
0%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests -1
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 6
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 0
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 4
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 9
Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about Ui Annotator MCP

Public trust evidence for Ui Annotator MCP is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Ui Annotator MCP publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Ui Annotator MCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Ui Annotator MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Ui Annotator MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.7/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Ui Annotator MCP actively maintained?
Stale. The repository has not been pushed to in 186 days. Consider whether the project is still being maintained.
What license does Ui Annotator MCP use?
Ui Annotator MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Ui Annotator MCP's commits signed?
0% of the last 100 commits to Ui Annotator MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Ui Annotator MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
medium confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Ui Annotator MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain Ui Annotator MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Ui Annotator MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 20HVTrust 3Listed 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1MCP 1Surface 1Surface 1
2026-09-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#1171 → #1197)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 98 spots (#1269 → #1171)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 25.4pts (14.3 → 39.7)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1269
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-18
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#1174 → #1163)
2026-09-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 13 spots (#1187 → #1174)
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#1160 → #1176)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#1148 → #1160)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#1126 → #1148)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#1111 → #1126)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 39 spots (#1072 → #1111)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#1046 → #1072)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 154 spots (#1200 → #1046)
2026-09-03
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 12.7pts (26.5 → 39.2)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 37 spots (#1163 → #1200)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 43 spots (#1120 → #1163)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#1090 → #1120)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 48 spots (#1042 → #1090)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 50 spots (#992 → #1042)
2026-08-28
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.7/10
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank rose 288 spots (#1280 → #992)
2026-08-28
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 11.4pts (15.3 → 26.7)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#1256 → #1274)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#1229 → #1256)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 76 spots (#1149 → #1225)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1147

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 38.0 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/ui-annotator-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/ui-annotator-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/ui-annotator-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/ui-annotator-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON