Is Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio safe to use?

Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio has an HVTrust score of 38.1/100 (Grade D), ranked #1242 of 1374 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio?

Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio scores 38.1/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 35 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio

Repository

GitHub Copilot agent skills for Power Automate via FlowStudio MCP — build, debug, and operate cloud flows programmatically

MCP Servers JavaScript Listed MIT

Is Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 3.0 / 10

Provenance None

Signed commits 0%

Last push 67d ago

Compare Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio scores 38.1/100 (Grade D), ranked #1242 of 1374 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.0/10; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-09-04. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Raise the OSSF Scorecard from 3.0 to 9.0lowest checks: Branch-Protection 0, CII-Best-Practices 0, Code-Review 0 +12.4 → 50.5 C · #560 of 778
Sign every commit0% signed today +5.0 → 43.1 D · #659 of 778

Already done? Suggest a correction Add the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

Source Unsigned

github.com/ninihen1/power-automate-mcp-skills, MIT, last pushed 2026-09-04. None of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature, so no change traces to a verified identity.
Review and release Weak

OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 3.0/10 (scanned Nov 7, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:
- Code Review0
- Branch Protection0
- Signed Releasesn/a
- Dangerous Workflown/a
- Token Permissionsn/a
- Pinned Dependenciesn/a
All 18 Scorecard checks

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests -1

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 0

Dangerous-Workflow -1

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 4

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies -1

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions -1

Vulnerabilities 10
Published packages None

No registry package. Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.

Changes to this chain

2026-09-05 OSSF Scorecard: 3.1/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.

GitHub repository data
Package downloads (missing)
Supply-chain checks
Public actions (missing)
Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio compares in MCP Servers

#715 Weapp Agent MCP 38.2 +0.1
#716 Tijori Finance MCP 38.2 +0.1
#717 Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio 38.1 this agent
#718 MCP Power Automate 38.1 ±0
#719 Just MCP Server 38.0 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio’s 38.1.

Where the 38.1 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

38.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

3.8 / 25

7.0 below avg 10.8

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

2.9 below avg 13.7

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

11.1 / 17

1.2 below avg 12.3

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

7.5 / 20

4.7 below avg 12.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

3.7 / 20

3.9 below avg 7.6

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.0/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 67 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.

Compare with another agent View MCP Servers Report missing data

29.8

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#717

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-11-10

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-09-04

67 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼1

was #1241

Analysis

Activity Inputs

29.8 / 100

StarsRepository reach

9.3 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

15.7 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

0.0 / 25

CommunityFork signal

4.7 / 20

Common questions about Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio

Public trust evidence for Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.0/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio actively maintained?

Slowing down. Last push was 67 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.

What license does Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio use?

Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio's commits signed?

0% of the last 100 commits to Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

2 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, Google Gemini

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-08-27

Activity Resumed

Activity resumed

Maintain Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-10-09

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#1169 → #1180)

2026-10-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 40 spots (#1124 → #1164)

2026-10-04

Activity Score Changed

Activity score down 6pts (41 → 35)

2026-09-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#1080 → #1096)

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, Google Gemini

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 491 spots (#581 → #1072)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 9.6pts (34.9 → 44.5)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #581

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-13

Rank Moved

Rank rose 39 spots (#1087 → #1048)

2026-09-12

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#1073 → #1087)

2026-09-11

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#1063 → #1073)

2026-09-09

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#1054 → #1068)

2026-09-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#1044 → #1054)

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 38 spots (#1006 → #1044)

2026-09-06

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#992 → #1006)

2026-09-05

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 3.1/10

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank rose 305 spots (#1297 → #992)

2026-09-05

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 24.7pts (19.5 → 44.2)

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 22 spots (#1272 → #1294)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 21 spots (#1251 → #1272)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#1235 → #1251)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 22 spots (#1213 → #1235)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 20 spots (#1193 → #1213)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 23 spots (#1170 → #1193)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 24 spots (#1146 → #1170)

2026-08-27

Activity Resumed

Activity resumed

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank rose 135 spots (#1281 → #1146)

2026-08-27

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 5.0pts (15.1 → 20.1)

2026-08-27

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 24pts (24 → 47)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#1263 → #1281)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 26 spots (#1233 → #1259)

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/power-automate-mcp-server-by-flow-studio.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/power-automate-mcp-server-by-flow-studio)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/power-automate-mcp-server-by-flow-studio"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/power-automate-mcp-server-by-flow-studio.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON

Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio

How Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio could raise its score

Chain of custody

Source Unsigned

Review and release Weak

Published packages None

Changes to this chain

Evidence behind this score

Verify this score yourself

What this score doesn’t check

How Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio compares in MCP Servers

Where the 38.1 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

Quick Trust Read

Rank Trend

Activity & Reach

Analysis

Activity Inputs

Common questions about Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio

AI agent surface

Maintain Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio?

Reputation Timeline

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

Other agents in MCP Servers