updated 2026-09-08 16:17 UTC

Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio

ninihen1/power-automate-mcp-skills

GitHub Copilot agent skills for Power Automate via FlowStudio MCP — build, debug, and operate cloud flows programmatical

MCP Servers JavaScript Grade D Listed MIT
43.9/100
Rank #1054 of 1328
Compare Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-09-04 · 4d ago
Recent change
Rank +8

Is Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio safe? Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio scores 43.9/100 (Grade D), ranked #1054 of 1328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.1/10; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-09-04. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#610 Excel MCP Server — 43.9 (D) → #611 PostgreSQL performance Tuner MCP Server — 43.9 (D) → #613 MCP Ip2location Io — 43.9 (D) → #614 WPFVisualTreeMcp — 43.8 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#1044 → #1054)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 38 spots (#1006 → #1044)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#992 → #1006)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.1/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio View MCP Servers Report missing data
47.9
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#612
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-08 16:17 UTC · Repo last pushed 4 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-08

Activity & Reach

Stars
32
Forks
9
Last Push
2026-09-04
4 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
5?
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
2
Rank Change
▼10
was #1044

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

43.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
3.9 / 25
6.0 below avg 9.9
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.6 below avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.1 / 17
0.9 below avg 12.0
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
13.3 / 20
1.1 above avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
3.6 / 20
3.3 below avg 6.9

Activity Inputs

47.9 / 100
StarsRepository reach
9.1 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.4 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
9.7 / 25
CommunityFork signal
4.7 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
3.1 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 5, 2026
Signed Commits
0%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests -1
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 0
Dangerous-Workflow -1
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 5
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies -1
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions -1
Vulnerabilities 10

Is Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio safe?

Public trust evidence for Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.1/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 4 day(s).
What license does Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio use?
Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio's commits signed?
0% of the last 100 commits to Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
2 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-27
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed

Maintain Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 15HVTrust 2Listed 1Score 1Fresh 1Scorecard 1
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#1044 → #1054)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 38 spots (#1006 → #1044)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#992 → #1006)
2026-09-05
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.1/10
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank rose 305 spots (#1297 → #992)
2026-09-05
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 24.7pts (19.5 → 44.2)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#1272 → #1294)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#1251 → #1272)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#1235 → #1251)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#1213 → #1235)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#1193 → #1213)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#1170 → #1193)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#1146 → #1170)
2026-08-27
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank rose 135 spots (#1281 → #1146)
2026-08-27
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 5.0pts (15.1 → 20.1)
2026-08-27
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 24pts (24 → 47)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#1263 → #1281)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#1233 → #1259)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 76 spots (#1153 → #1229)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1152
GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 43.9 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/power-automate-mcp-server-by-flow-studio.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/power-automate-mcp-server-by-flow-studio)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/power-automate-mcp-server-by-flow-studio"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/power-automate-mcp-server-by-flow-studio.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON