Tlive

Self-hosted remote approvals + live monitoring for Claude Code / Codex — via Telegram, Feishu, or a web terminal. Any subscription or API key.

Agent Skills TypeScript Listed MIT

Is Tlive safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 3.5 / 10
Provenance Attested
Signed commits 67%
Last push 31d ago
Advisories None known
Compare Tlive
Suggest a correction

In detail: Tlive scores 66.5/100 (Grade B), ranked #48 of 371 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.5/10; 67% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (tlive); last pushed 2026-09-09. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Tlive could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Tlive and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and, for skills, AST02 Supply Chain Compromise.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/y49/tlive, MIT, last pushed 2026-09-09. 67% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Weak

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 3.5/10 (scanned Oct 4, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review0
    • Branch Protection3
    • Signed Releasesn/a
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies0
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 3
    CI-Tests 10
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 0
    Contributors 0
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging -1
    Pinned-Dependencies 0
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 0
    Signed-Releases -1
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 0
  3. Published packages Linked and attested

    • npm tlive Source link points back to this repo Build provenance attested
  4. What you install today No known advisories

    Latest release checked: tlive 5.3.1. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-10-10).

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-09-23 Package provenance attestation detected
  • 2026-08-28 OSSF Scorecard: 3.5/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Tlive’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read the skill’s instructions for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you install it, such as Cisco Skill Scanner.

How Tlive compares in Agent Skills

  1. #46 Context Mode 66.8 +0.3
  2. #47 Orchestkit 66.7 +0.2
  3. #48 Tlive 66.5 this agent
  4. #49 Loop Engineering 66.3 −0.2
  5. #50 Openbrowser Ai 66.3 −0.2

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Tlive’s 66.5.

Where the 66.5 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

66.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Tlive Agent Skills average (371 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
15.2 / 25
7.4 above avg 7.8
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
6.6 above avg 11.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.5 / 17
0.5 below avg 12.0
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
9.9 / 20
4.2 below avg 14.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
8.2 / 20
0.8 below avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Improve adoption to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.
Recent Changes
2026-10-02
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 5pts (52 → 46)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.5/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 31 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
41.7
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#48

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-10-10 20:07 UTC · Repo last pushed 31 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
215
Forks
31
Last Push
2026-09-09
31 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
88
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
=
was #48

Analysis

Activity Inputs

41.7 / 100
StarsRepository reach
14.0 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
20.7 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
7.0 / 20

Common questions about Tlive

Tlive has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Tlive publish package provenance?
Yes. Tlive's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Tlive have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Tlive has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Tlive actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 31 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does Tlive use?
Tlive ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Tlive's commits signed?
67% of the last 100 commits to Tlive are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
medium confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Tlive's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected

Maintain Tlive?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Tlive from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 9HVTrust 3Listed 2Grade 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1Provenance 1Surface 1Surface 1Score 1
2026-10-02
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 5pts (52 → 46)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 279 spots (#312 → #33)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 44.4pts (25.1 → 69.5)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #312
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-07
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank rose 168 spots (#194 → #26)
2026-09-07
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 24.0pts (48.6 → 72.6)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#179 → #190)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#146 → #160)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#130 → #146)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#110 → #130)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#86 → #110)
2026-08-28
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.5/10
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#76 → #86)
2026-08-28
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 4.8pts (43.8 → 48.6)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#55 → #76)
2026-08-26
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #55

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 66.5 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/tlive.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/tlive)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/tlive"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/tlive.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON