Is ClawBio safe to use?

ClawBio has an HVTrust score of 69.5/100 (Grade B), ranked #34 of 351 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for ClawBio?

ClawBio scores 69.5/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 1.1k GitHub stars and is categorized under Agent Skills.

ClawBio

ClawBio/ClawBio

🦖 ClawBio - The first bioinformatics-native AI agent skill library. Local-first. Reproducible. Open. Free.

Agent Skills Python Listed NOASSERTION

Is ClawBio safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 7.0 / 10

Provenance None

Signed commits 39%

Last push yesterday

Compare ClawBio

How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: ClawBio scores 69.5/100 (Grade B), ranked #34 of 351 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 7.0/10; 39% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-25. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How ClawBio compares in Agent Skills

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks ClawBio’s 69.5.

Where the 69.5 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

69.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

ClawBio Agent Skills average (351 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

10.7 / 25

2.6 above avg 8.1

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.6 below avg 11.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

14.4 / 17

2.2 above avg 12.2

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

19.9 / 20

5.7 above avg 14.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

9.5 / 20

0.5 above avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, OpenAI

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintainer Checklist

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for ClawBio View Agent Skills Report missing data

79.8

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#34

In Agent Skills

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars

1.1k

Forks

277

Last Push

2026-09-25

yesterday

Commits (4 wk)

344

Downloads (7d)

pypi

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼1

was #33

Analysis

Activity Inputs

79.8 / 100

StarsRepository reach

18.4 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.9 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

25 / 25

CommunityFork signal

11.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

7.0 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 24, 2026

Signed Commits

39%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 8

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 10

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Fuzzing 0

License 9

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 10

SAST 10

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases 0

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about ClawBio

ClawBio has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does ClawBio publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for ClawBio. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does ClawBio have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

ClawBio has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 7.0/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is ClawBio actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does ClawBio use?

ClawBio ships under NOASSERTION. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are ClawBio's commits signed?

39% of the last 100 commits to ClawBio are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

ClawBio appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

2 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to ClawBio's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, OpenAI

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain ClawBio?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores ClawBio from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, OpenAI

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → B

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank rose 165 spots (#197 → #32)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 34.5pts (35.2 → 69.7)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #197

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-05

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → B

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#36 → #46)

2026-09-02

License Changed

License changed from MIT to NOASSERTION

2026-09-02

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank rose 162 spots (#194 → #32)

2026-09-02

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 22.1pts (42.8 → 64.9)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#179 → #194)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#165 → #179)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 30 spots (#135 → #165)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 33 spots (#102 → #135)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 19 spots (#83 → #102)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 21 spots (#62 → #83)

2026-08-26

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 3.9/10

2026-08-26

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 18.5pts (23.8 → 42.3)

2026-08-11

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #71

GitHub → PyPI: clawbio

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/clawbio.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/clawbio)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/clawbio"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/clawbio.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON