updated 2026-11-10 04:07 UTC

ClawBio

Repository Website

🦖 ClawBio - The first bioinformatics-native AI agent skill library. Local-first. Reproducible. Open. Free.

Agent Skills Python Listed NOASSERTION

Is ClawBio safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 7.0 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 63%
Last push yesterday
Advisories None known
Compare ClawBio

How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: ClawBio scores 70.4/100 (Grade B), ranked #33 of 384 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 7.0/10; 63% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (clawbio); last pushed 2026-11-09. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How ClawBio could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Already done? Suggest a correctionAdd the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships ClawBio and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and, for skills, AST02 Supply Chain Compromise.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/ClawBio/ClawBio, NOASSERTION, last pushed 2026-11-09. 63% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Strong

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 7.0/10 (scanned Oct 26, 2026, refresh pending). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review10
    • Branch Protection8
    • Signed Releases0
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies10
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 8
    CI-Tests 10
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 10
    Contributors 10
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 10
    Fuzzing 0
    License 9
    Maintained 10
    Packaging 10
    Pinned-Dependencies 10
    SAST 10
    Security-Policy 10
    Signed-Releases 0
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 0

  3. Published packages Linked, not attested

    • PyPI clawbio Source link points back to this repo No build attestation

    Without a build attestation, nothing proves the published files were built from this repository.

  4. What you install today No known advisories

    Latest release checked: clawbio 0.7.1. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-11-09).

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-09-02 License changed from MIT to NOASSERTION
  • 2026-08-26 OSSF Scorecard: 3.9/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues ClawBio’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read the skill’s instructions for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you install it, such as Cisco Skill Scanner.

How ClawBio compares in Agent Skills

  1. #31 SkillOpt 72.2 +1.8
  2. #32 Computer Use Linux 71.1 +0.7
  3. #33 ClawBio 70.4 this agent
  4. #34 Reactive Resume 69.4 −1.0
  5. #35 RuView 69.4 −1.0

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks ClawBio’s 70.4.

Where the 70.4 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

70.4 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

ClawBio Agent Skills average (384 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
11.9 / 25
3.7 above avg 8.2
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.6 below avg 11.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
14.4 / 17
2.2 above avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
19.9 / 20
5.9 above avg 14.0
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
9.2 / 20
in line with avg 9.1

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Maintainer Checklist
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Compare with another agent
View Agent Skills Report missing data
79.9
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#33
In Agent Skills

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-11-10 04:07 UTC · Repo last pushed yesterday

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-11-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
1.2k
Forks
292
Last Push
2026-11-09
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
334
Downloads (7d)
23
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
23
Rank Change
=
was #33

Analysis

Activity Inputs

79.9 / 100
StarsRepository reach
18.4 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
11.5 / 20

Common questions about ClawBio

ClawBio has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does ClawBio publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for ClawBio. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does ClawBio have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
ClawBio has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 7.0/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is ClawBio actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does ClawBio use?
ClawBio ships under NOASSERTION. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are ClawBio's commits signed?
63% of the last 100 commits to ClawBio are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
ClawBio appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
2 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to ClawBio's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, OpenAI
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain ClawBio?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores ClawBio from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 9HVTrust 3Grade 3Scorecard 1License 1Delisted 1Listed 1MCP 1Surface 1Surface 1
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, OpenAI
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 165 spots (#197 → #32)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 34.5pts (35.2 → 69.7)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #197
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-05
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#36 → #46)
2026-09-02
License Changed
License changed from MIT to NOASSERTION
2026-09-02
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 162 spots (#194 → #32)
2026-09-02
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 22.1pts (42.8 → 64.9)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#179 → #194)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#165 → #179)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#135 → #165)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 33 spots (#102 → #135)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#83 → #102)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#62 → #83)
2026-08-26
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.9/10
2026-08-26
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 18.5pts (23.8 → 42.3)
GitHub → Website → PyPI: clawbio

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 70.4 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/clawbio.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/clawbio)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/clawbio"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/clawbio.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON