Titen

Agent memory that needs no API key, no LLM, and no embedding provider. One command on Bun and it is serving MCP over stdio against a local SQLite store. Drop-in for the MCP reference memory server. Every memory keeps its source, who may read it, and the evidence that contradicts it.

Memory & Knowledge TypeScript Listed Apache-2.0

Is Titen safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 18%
Last push yesterday
Advisories None known
Compare Titen

How does it stack up against its Memory & Knowledge neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: Titen scores 61.5/100 (Grade C), ranked #663 of 1387 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.9/10; 18% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (titen-memory); last pushed 2026-11-10. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Titen could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Titen and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/RamaAditya49/titen, Apache-2.0, last pushed 2026-11-10. 18% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Mixed

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 4.9/10 (scanned Nov 7, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review2
    • Branch Protection0
    • Signed Releasesn/a
    • Dangerous Workflown/a
    • Token Permissionsn/a
    • Pinned Dependencies4
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 0
    CI-Tests 4
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 2
    Contributors 10
    Dangerous-Workflow -1
    Dependency-Update-Tool 10
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging -1
    Pinned-Dependencies 4
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 10
    Signed-Releases -1
    Token-Permissions -1
    Vulnerabilities 0
  3. Published packages Linked, not attested

    • npm titen-memory Source link points back to this repo No build attestation

    Without a build attestation, nothing proves the published files were built from this repository.

  4. What you install today No known advisories

    Latest release checked: titen-memory 0.10.10. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-11-10).

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-08-26 OSSF Scorecard: 3.5/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Titen’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How Titen compares in Memory & Knowledge

  1. #35 Zvec 63.6 +2.1
  2. #36 AnythingLLM 62.5 +1.0
  3. #37 Titen 61.5 this agent
  4. #38 PrivateGPT 59.8 −1.7
  5. #39 memU 59.3 −2.2

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Titen’s 61.5.

Where the 61.5 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Memory & Knowledge average

61.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Titen Memory & Knowledge average (52 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
7.0 / 25
4.7 below avg 11.7
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
1.8 below avg 12.6
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.7 / 17
in line with avg 12.9
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
19.3 / 20
2.0 above avg 17.3
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
7.0 / 20
6.1 below avg 13.1

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-11-08
Rank Moved
Rank rose 43 spots (#708 → #665)
2026-11-06
Rank Moved
Rank rose 19 spots (#731 → #712)
2026-11-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#713 → #723)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.9/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
57.6
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#37

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-11-11 00:08 UTC · Repo last pushed yesterday

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-11-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
16
Forks
2
Last Push
2026-11-10
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
69
Downloads (7d)
1,014
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
▼1
was #662

Analysis

Activity Inputs

57.6 / 100
StarsRepository reach
7.4 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
23.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
2.2 / 20

Common questions about Titen

Titen has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Titen publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Titen. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Titen have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Titen has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.9/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Titen actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Titen use?
Titen ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Titen's commits signed?
18% of the last 100 commits to Titen are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Titen appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Titen's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-03
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: extension-based → declared

Maintain Titen?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Titen from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 35HVTrust 2Grade 2Surface 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1Listed 1MCP 1Surface 1
2026-11-08
Rank Moved
Rank rose 43 spots (#708 → #665)
2026-11-06
Rank Moved
Rank rose 19 spots (#731 → #712)
2026-11-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#713 → #723)
2026-11-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 44 spots (#757 → #713)
2026-10-28
Rank Moved
Rank rose 79 spots (#831 → #752)
2026-10-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#797 → #820)
2026-10-22
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#772 → #786)
2026-10-14
Rank Moved
Rank rose 73 spots (#840 → #767)
2026-10-13
Rank Moved
Rank rose 13 spots (#853 → #840)
2026-10-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#841 → #853)
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#823 → #834)
2026-10-06
Rank Moved
Rank rose 23 spots (#842 → #819)
2026-10-05
Rank Moved
Rank rose 45 spots (#887 → #842)
2026-10-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#871 → #887)
2026-09-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 16 spots (#873 → #857)
2026-09-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#833 → #845)
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank rose 23 spots (#849 → #826)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 177 spots (#1022 → #845)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 28.6pts (24.5 → 53.1)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1022
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#845 → #856)
2026-09-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#827 → #839)
2026-09-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 39 spots (#788 → #827)
2026-09-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#740 → #766)
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#720 → #740)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#710 → #720)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 75 spots (#635 → #710)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 38 spots (#597 → #635)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 78 spots (#519 → #597)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#503 → #519)
2026-09-03
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: extension-based → declared
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 38 spots (#465 → #503)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#451 → #465)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#438 → #451)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 34 spots (#404 → #438)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 16 spots (#420 → #404)
2026-08-26
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.5/10
2026-08-26
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 299 spots (#708 → #409)
2026-08-26
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 22.9pts (35.2 → 58.1)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#693 → #706)

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 61.5 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/titen.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/titen)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/titen"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/titen.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Memory & Knowledge

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON