Titen

Agent memory that needs no API key, no LLM, and no embedding provider. One command on Bun and it is serving MCP over stdio against a local SQLite store. Drop-in for the MCP reference memory server. Every memory keeps its source, who may read it, and the evidence that contradicts it.

Memory & Knowledge TypeScript Listed Apache-2.0

Is Titen safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 2.8 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 8%
Last push yesterday
Compare Titen

How does it stack up against its Memory & Knowledge neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: Titen scores 53.8/100 (Grade C), ranked #833 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.8/10; 8% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-25. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Titen compares in Memory & Knowledge

  1. #35 MemOS 57.4 +3.6
  2. #36 Quivr 54.5 +0.7
  3. #37 Titen 53.8 this agent
  4. #38 inno-agent 52.9 −0.9
  5. #39 pgvector 52.5 −1.3

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Titen’s 53.8.

Where the 53.8 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Memory & Knowledge average

53.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Titen Memory & Knowledge average (44 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
3.9 / 25
7.9 below avg 11.8
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
1.8 below avg 12.6
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
10.9 / 17
2.0 below avg 12.9
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
17.7 / 20
0.5 above avg 17.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
5.8 / 20
7.8 below avg 13.6

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank rose 23 spots (#849 → #826)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 2.8/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
52.7
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#37

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 10:08 UTC · Repo last pushed yesterday

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
16
Forks
2
Last Push
2026-09-25
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
27
Downloads (7d)
134
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
2
Rank Change
▼7
was #826

Analysis

Activity Inputs

52.7 / 100
StarsRepository reach
7.4 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
18.1 / 25
CommunityFork signal
2.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
2.8 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 25, 2026
Signed Commits
8%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests 0
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow -1
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 0
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 4
SAST 0
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions -1
Vulnerabilities 2

Common questions about Titen

Public trust evidence for Titen is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Titen publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Titen. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Titen have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Titen has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 2.8/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Titen actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Titen use?
Titen ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Titen's commits signed?
8% of the last 100 commits to Titen are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Titen appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Titen's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-03
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: extension-based → declared

Maintain Titen?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Titen from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 19Listed 2HVTrust 2Grade 2Surface 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1MCP 1Surface 1
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank rose 23 spots (#849 → #826)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 177 spots (#1022 → #845)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 28.6pts (24.5 → 53.1)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1022
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#845 → #856)
2026-09-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#827 → #839)
2026-09-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 39 spots (#788 → #827)
2026-09-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#740 → #766)
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#720 → #740)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#710 → #720)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 75 spots (#635 → #710)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 38 spots (#597 → #635)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 78 spots (#519 → #597)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#503 → #519)
2026-09-03
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: extension-based → declared
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 38 spots (#465 → #503)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#451 → #465)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#438 → #451)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 34 spots (#404 → #438)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 16 spots (#420 → #404)
2026-08-26
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.5/10
2026-08-26
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 299 spots (#708 → #409)
2026-08-26
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 22.9pts (35.2 → 58.1)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#693 → #706)
2026-08-10
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #696

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 53.8 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/titen.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/titen)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/titen"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/titen.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Memory & Knowledge

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON