memU

Personal memory across agents

Memory & Knowledge Python Grade C Listed NOASSERTION
61.2/100
Rank #560 of 1328
Compare memU

How does it stack up against its Memory & Knowledge neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-09-10 · 2d ago
Recent change
Rank +5

Is memU safe? memU scores 61.2/100 (Grade C), ranked #560 of 1328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.3/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-10. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Memory & Knowledge

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#545 → #565)
2026-09-10
Rank Moved
Rank rose 17 spots (#562 → #545)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#538 → #556)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
81.9
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#32

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-12 03:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 2 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-12

Activity & Reach

Stars
14.4k
Forks
1.1k
Last Push
2026-09-10
2 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
26
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
64
Rank Change
▲5
was #565

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Memory & Knowledge

61.2 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

memU Memory & Knowledge average (44 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
11.6 / 25
in line with avg 11.5
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
1.6 below avg 12.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.0 / 17
in line with avg 12.9
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
17.6 / 20
in line with avg 17.4
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
10.0 / 20
3.7 below avg 13.7

Activity Inputs

81.9 / 100
StarsRepository reach
25.0 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.7 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
17.9 / 25
CommunityFork signal
14.1 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
5.3 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 10, 2026
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 4
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 10
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 9
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 10

Is memU safe?

memU has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does memU publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for memU. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does memU have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
memU has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is memU actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 2 day(s).
What license does memU use?
memU ships under NOASSERTION. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are memU's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to memU are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
2 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
1 tags
Broad capability areas detected.
  • database
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain memU?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores memU from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 21Listed 1Scorecard 1
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#545 → #565)
2026-09-10
Rank Moved
Rank rose 17 spots (#562 → #545)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#538 → #556)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#507 → #538)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#495 → #507)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 73 spots (#422 → #495)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#395 → #417)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#385 → #395)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#358 → #378)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#350 → #361)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 28 spots (#314 → #342)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#284 → #305)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#290 → #278)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#278 → #290)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 17 spots (#300 → #283)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#288 → #300)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank rose 10 spots (#290 → #280)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 18 spots (#308 → #290)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#288 → #308)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 69 spots (#216 → #285)
2026-08-07
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.4/10
2026-07-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#416 → #426)
2026-07-28
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #416

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 61.2 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/memu.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/memu)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/memu"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/memu.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Memory & Knowledge

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON