Is Talkthrough MCP safe to use?

Talkthrough MCP has an HVTrust score of 80.9/100 (Grade A), ranked #90 of 1320 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Talkthrough MCP?

Talkthrough MCP scores 80.9/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 24 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

Talkthrough MCP

korovin-aa97/talkthrough-mcp

Don't write a bug report — record it. Local MCP: screen recording → transcript, frames, OCR, wall-clock evidence for cod

MCP Servers Python Grade A Listed MIT

80.9/100

Rank #90 of 1320

Compare Talkthrough MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade B · 3/5 signals

Last push

2026-09-03 · 1d ago

Recent change

Scorecard +11

Is Talkthrough MCP safe? Talkthrough MCP scores 80.9/100 (Grade A), ranked #90 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 7/10; 58% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-03. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#31 LibreNMS MCP — 81.0 (A) → #32 MCP Server Couchbase — 81.0 (A) → #34 Semantic Scholar MCP Server — 80.8 (A) → #35 MediaWiki MCP Server — 80.5 (A) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Improve adoption to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.

Recent Changes

2026-09-04

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 7.0/10

2026-09-04

Grade Changed

Trust grade B → A

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank rose 192 spots (#282 → #90)

Maintainer Checklist

Keep signals current Trust posture is already in a healthy range. The main job is to keep provenance, maintenance, and public evidence fresh.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Talkthrough MCP View MCP Servers Report missing data

51.3

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#33

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade A reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-09-03

yesterday

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

234

pypi

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▲192

was #282

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

80.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Talkthrough MCP MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

19.1 / 25

9.6 above avg 9.5

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

18.0 / 18

4.6 above avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

14.4 / 17

2.6 above avg 11.8

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

17.2 / 20

5.0 above avg 12.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

6.5 / 20

in line with avg 6.2

Activity Inputs

51.3 / 100

StarsRepository reach

8.4 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.9 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

16.5 / 25

CommunityFork signal

1.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

Verified

pypi attestation

OSSF Scorecard

7.0 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 4, 2026

Signed Commits

58%

of last 100 commits verified

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Token-Permissions 10

Code-Review 0

Maintained 0

Security-Policy 10

Binary-Artifacts 10

Pinned-Dependencies 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Vulnerabilities 10

Packaging 10

Fuzzing 0

License 10

SAST 10

Branch-Protection 8

Signed-Releases 4

Contributors 0

CI-Tests 10

Is Talkthrough MCP safe?

Public supply-chain signals for Talkthrough MCP are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but Talkthrough MCP carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.

Does Talkthrough MCP publish package provenance?

Yes. Talkthrough MCP's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.

Does Talkthrough MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Talkthrough MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 7/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Talkthrough MCP actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does Talkthrough MCP use?

Talkthrough MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Talkthrough MCP's commits signed?

57% of the last 100 commits to Talkthrough MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

medium confidence

Implemented

Talkthrough MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

medium confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Anthropic

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain Talkthrough MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Talkthrough MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-04

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 7.0/10

2026-09-04

Grade Changed

Trust grade B → A

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank rose 192 spots (#282 → #90)

2026-09-04

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 14.6pts (66.3 → 80.9)

2026-09-02

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → B

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank rose 571 spots (#844 → #273)

2026-09-02

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 22.6pts (43.6 → 66.2)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 32 spots (#812 → #844)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 33 spots (#779 → #812)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 36 spots (#743 → #779)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 40 spots (#703 → #743)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 20 spots (#683 → #703)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#667 → #683)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 97 spots (#570 → #667)

2026-08-25

Rank Moved

Rank rose 11 spots (#581 → #570)

2026-08-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#570 → #581)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 22 spots (#551 → #573)

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#542 → #556)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 26 spots (#523 → #549)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #513

GitHub → PyPI: talkthrough-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/talkthrough-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/talkthrough-mcp)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/talkthrough-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/talkthrough-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON