updated 2026-11-11 00:08 UTC

Outline MCP Server

Repository

A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server enabling AI assistants to interact with Outline documentation services.

MCP Servers Python Listed MIT

Is Outline MCP Server safe? Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

OSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10
Provenance Attested
Signed commits 100%
Last push 11d ago
Advisories None known
Compare Outline MCP Server

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: Outline MCP Server scores 77.0/100 (Grade B), ranked #239 of 1387 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.2/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (mcp-outline); last pushed 2026-10-31. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Outline MCP Server could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Already done? Suggest a correctionAdd the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Outline MCP Server and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Signed

    github.com/Vortiago/mcp-outline, MIT, last pushed 2026-10-31. 100% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature, so changes trace to a verified account.

  2. Review and release Mixed

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 5.2/10 (scanned Nov 6, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review0
    • Branch Protection3
    • Signed Releasesn/a
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions6
    • Pinned Dependencies7
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 3
    CI-Tests 10
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 0
    Contributors 0
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 10
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 1
    Packaging 10
    Pinned-Dependencies 7
    SAST 10
    Security-Policy 0
    Signed-Releases -1
    Token-Permissions 6
    Vulnerabilities 0

  3. Published packages Linked and attested

    • PyPI mcp-outline Source link points back to this repo Build provenance attested

  4. What you install today No known advisories

    Latest release checked: mcp-outline 1.11.0. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-11-10).

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-09-23 Package provenance attestation detected
  • 2026-09-02 OSSF Scorecard: 6.2/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Outline MCP Server’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How Outline MCP Server compares in MCP Servers

  1. #133 Telegram (mcp-telegram) 77.2 +0.2
  2. #134 Talkthrough MCP 77.0 ±0
  3. #135 Outline MCP Server 77.0 this agent
  4. #136 Music Studio 76.9 −0.1
  5. #137 MCP Gsheets 76.9 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Outline MCP Server’s 77.0.

Where the 77.0 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

77.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Outline MCP Server MCP Servers average (779 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
19.0 / 25
8.2 above avg 10.8
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.3 above avg 13.7
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.9 / 17
0.6 above avg 12.3
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
13.2 / 20
0.9 above avg 12.3
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
9.2 / 20
1.6 above avg 7.6

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Improve adoption to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.
Recent Changes
2026-10-31
Rank Moved
Rank rose 138 spots (#376 → #238)
2026-10-31
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 6.7pts (69.7 → 76.4)
2026-10-31
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 18pts (34 → 52)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.2/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Compare with another agent
View MCP Servers Report missing data
50.5
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#135
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-11-11 00:08 UTC · Repo last pushed 11 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-11-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
159
Forks
45
Last Push
2026-10-31
11 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
2
Downloads (7d)
887
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
6
Rank Change
▲1
was #240

Analysis

Activity Inputs

50.5 / 100
StarsRepository reach
13.2 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
23.5 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
6.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
7.7 / 20

Common questions about Outline MCP Server

Public supply-chain signals for Outline MCP Server are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but Outline MCP Server carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.
Does Outline MCP Server publish package provenance?
Yes. Outline MCP Server's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Outline MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Outline MCP Server has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.2/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Outline MCP Server actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 11 days ago.
What license does Outline MCP Server use?
Outline MCP Server ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Outline MCP Server's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to Outline MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Implemented
Outline MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Outline MCP Server's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected

Maintain Outline MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Outline MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 18Grade 3HVTrust 3Score 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1Listed 1Provenance 1MCP 1Surface 1Surface 1
2026-10-31
Rank Moved
Rank rose 138 spots (#376 → #238)
2026-10-31
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 6.7pts (69.7 → 76.4)
2026-10-31
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 18pts (34 → 52)
2026-10-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#348 → #363)
2026-10-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#311 → #325)
2026-10-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#260 → #278)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 731 spots (#975 → #244)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 48.5pts (25.3 → 73.8)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #975
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#196 → #213)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 48 spots (#151 → #199)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#137 → #151)
2026-09-02
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 6.2/10
2026-09-02
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 212 spots (#345 → #133)
2026-09-02
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 12.9pts (63.2 → 76.1)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 28 spots (#309 → #337)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#302 → #317)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#288 → #298)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#272 → #288)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#251 → #270)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 15 spots (#268 → #253)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#253 → #266)
2026-08-18
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → C
2026-08-18
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 41 spots (#212 → #253)
2026-08-18
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 10pts (54 → 44)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 13 spots (#225 → #212)
GitHub → PyPI: mcp-outline

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 77.0 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/outline-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/outline-mcp-server)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/outline-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/outline-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON