Is SportIQ MCP safe to use?

SportIQ MCP has an HVTrust score of 59.2/100 (Grade C), ranked #343 of 1283 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for SportIQ MCP?

SportIQ MCP scores 59.2/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 10 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

SportIQ MCP

Ninjabeam20/SportIQ-MCP

MCP server with 25+ AI-callable tools for IPL, F1 & FIFA WC 2026 — Dream11 solver, F1 pit-strategy model, Monte Carlo br

MCP Servers Python Grade C Listed MIT

59.2/100

Rank #343 of 1283

Compare SportIQ MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade B · 3/5 signals

Last push

2026-07-14 · 29d ago

Recent change

Rank +1

Is SportIQ MCP safe? SportIQ MCP scores 59.2/100 (Grade C), ranked #343 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-07-14. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#115 Web Researcher MCP — 59.4 (C) → #116 SearXNG Search — 59.3 (C) → #118 Codex Control Plane MCP — 58.8 (C) → #119 AntV Chart MCP Server — 58.6 (C) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.

Recent Changes

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 20 spots (#318 → #338)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #311

Maintainer Checklist

Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for SportIQ MCP View MCP Servers Report missing data

44.0

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#117

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-07-14

29 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

pypi

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼2

was #341

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

59.2 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

SportIQ MCP MCP Servers average (761 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

7.5 / 25

2.5 above avg 5.0

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

18.0 / 18

4.7 above avg 13.3

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

8.5 / 17

in line with avg 8.8

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

15.4 / 20

3.0 above avg 12.4

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

5.1 / 20

0.7 below avg 5.8

Activity Inputs

44.0 / 100

StarsRepository reach

6.2 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

21.0 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

16.7 / 25

CommunityFork signal

0.0 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

Verified

pypi attestation

OSSF Scorecard

—

Not available

Signed Commits

of last 100 commits verified

Is SportIQ MCP safe?

SportIQ MCP has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does SportIQ MCP publish package provenance?

Yes. SportIQ MCP's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.

Does SportIQ MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for SportIQ MCP. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.

Is SportIQ MCP actively maintained?

Maintained. Last push was 29 days ago.

What license does SportIQ MCP use?

SportIQ MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are SportIQ MCP's commits signed?

0% of the last 100 commits to SportIQ MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

SportIQ MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Redis

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

medium confidence

1 tags

Broad capability areas detected.

database

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain SportIQ MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores SportIQ MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 20 spots (#318 → #338)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #311

GitHub → PyPI: sportiq-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/sportiq-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/sportiq-mcp)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/sportiq-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/sportiq-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON