updated 2026-11-10 04:07 UTC

SportIQ MCP

Repository Website

MCP server with 25+ AI-callable tools for IPL, F1 & FIFA WC 2026 — Dream11 solver, F1 pit-strategy model, Monte Carlo bracket simulator. Works with Claude, Cursor & Zed.

MCP Servers Python Listed MIT

Is SportIQ MCP safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10
Provenance Attested
Signed commits 14%
Last push 18d ago
Advisories None known
Compare SportIQ MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: SportIQ MCP scores 68.8/100 (Grade B), ranked #399 of 1374 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.5/10; 14% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (sportiq-mcp); last pushed 2026-10-23. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How SportIQ MCP could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Already done? Suggest a correctionAdd the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships SportIQ MCP and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/Ninjabeam20/SportIQ-MCP, MIT, last pushed 2026-10-23. 14% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Mixed

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 4.5/10 (scanned Oct 20, 2026, refresh pending). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review1
    • Branch Protection5
    • Signed Releasesn/a
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies1
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 5
    CI-Tests 5
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 1
    Contributors 0
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging 10
    Pinned-Dependencies 1
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 10
    Signed-Releases -1
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 0

  3. Published packages Linked and attested

    • PyPI sportiq-mcp Source link points back to this repo Build provenance attested

  4. What you install today No known advisories

    Latest release checked: sportiq-mcp 0.4.0. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-11-10).

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-09-23 Package provenance attestation detected
  • 2026-08-29 OSSF Scorecard: 4.0/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues SportIQ MCP’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How SportIQ MCP compares in MCP Servers

  1. #234 Grafana MCP Server 68.8 ±0
  2. #235 Airtable 68.8 ±0
  3. #236 SportIQ MCP 68.8 this agent
  4. #237 Opentargets MCP 68.7 −0.1
  5. #238 MCP Accessibility Scanner 68.7 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks SportIQ MCP’s 68.8.

Where the 68.8 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

68.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

SportIQ MCP MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
13.8 / 25
3.0 above avg 10.8
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.3 above avg 13.7
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.3 / 17
in line with avg 12.3
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
15.4 / 20
3.2 above avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
4.6 / 20
3.0 below avg 7.6

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.
Recent Changes
2026-10-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#360 → #380)
2026-10-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 49 spots (#400 → #351)
2026-10-23
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 6pts (44 → 50)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.5/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Compare with another agent
View MCP Servers Report missing data
44.5
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#236
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-11-10 04:07 UTC · Repo last pushed 18 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-11-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
10
Forks
1
Last Push
2026-10-23
18 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
13
Downloads (7d)
35
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
▲6
was #405

Analysis

Activity Inputs

44.5 / 100
StarsRepository reach
6.2 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
22.5 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
14.3 / 25
CommunityFork signal
1.4 / 20

Common questions about SportIQ MCP

SportIQ MCP has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does SportIQ MCP publish package provenance?
Yes. SportIQ MCP's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does SportIQ MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
SportIQ MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is SportIQ MCP actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 18 days ago.
What license does SportIQ MCP use?
SportIQ MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are SportIQ MCP's commits signed?
14% of the last 100 commits to SportIQ MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
SportIQ MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
medium confidence
1 tags
Broad capability areas detected.
  • database
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to SportIQ MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Redis
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected

Maintain SportIQ MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores SportIQ MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 26Score 5HVTrust 4Grade 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1Listed 1Provenance 1MCP 1Surface 1
2026-10-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#360 → #380)
2026-10-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 49 spots (#400 → #351)
2026-10-23
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 6pts (44 → 50)
2026-10-20
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#386 → #396)
2026-10-17
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#356 → #380)
2026-10-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#324 → #340)
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank rose 10 spots (#340 → #330)
2026-10-01
Rank Moved
Rank rose 10 spots (#334 → #324)
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank rose 93 spots (#434 → #341)
2026-09-25
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 3.5pts (66.2 → 69.7)
2026-09-25
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 10pts (41 → 51)
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Redis
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 590 spots (#1024 → #434)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 41.7pts (24.4 → 66.1)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1024
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-19
Rank Moved
Rank rose 46 spots (#460 → #414)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#414 → #427)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#396 → #406)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#371 → #396)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 59 spots (#307 → #366)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#297 → #307)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 58 spots (#239 → #297)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 58 spots (#297 → #239)
2026-09-02
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 8pts (35 → 42)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 28 spots (#261 → #289)
2026-08-29
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.0/10
2026-08-29
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank rose 263 spots (#529 → #266)
2026-08-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 12.6pts (52.8 → 65.4)
2026-08-29
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 10pts (25 → 35)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#508 → #521)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 63 spots (#445 → #508)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#429 → #444)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 15 spots (#447 → #432)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#430 → #444)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#440 → #429)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 70 spots (#357 → #427)
2026-08-13
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 3.9pts (57.7 → 53.8)
2026-08-13
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 12pts (39 → 27)
GitHub → Website → PyPI: sportiq-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 68.8 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/sportiq-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/sportiq-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/sportiq-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/sportiq-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON