Is Opentargets MCP safe to use?

Opentargets MCP has an HVTrust score of 57.7/100 (Grade C), ranked #672 of 1328 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Opentargets MCP?

Opentargets MCP scores 57.7/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 19 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

Opentargets MCP

nickzren/opentargets-mcp

MCP server for Open Targets data

MCP Servers Python Grade C Listed MIT

57.7/100

Rank #672 of 1328

Compare Opentargets MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade B · 3/5 signals

Last push

2026-05-15 · 121d ago

Recent change

Rank +3

Is Opentargets MCP safe? Opentargets MCP scores 57.7/100 (Grade C), ranked #672 of 1328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.6/10; 9% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-05-15. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#361 Vibe Check MCP Server — 57.9 (C) → #362 Paparats – Local Semantic Code Search MCP — 57.7 (C) → #364 Browser Tools MCP — 57.7 (C) → #365 Orcaslicer MCP — 57.6 (C) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.

Recent Changes

2026-09-11

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#652 → #664)

2026-09-09

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#634 → #646)

2026-09-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#622 → #634)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.6/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 121 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Opentargets MCP View MCP Servers Report missing data

20.4

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#363

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-13

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-05-15

121 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

pypi

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼1

was #671

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

57.7 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Opentargets MCP MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

13.7 / 25

3.6 above avg 10.1

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

18.0 / 18

4.6 above avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

12.4 / 17

in line with avg 12.1

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

3.9 / 20

8.2 below avg 12.1

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

4.7 / 20

2.3 below avg 7.0

Activity Inputs

20.4 / 100

StarsRepository reach

7.8 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

8.2 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

0.0 / 25

CommunityFork signal

4.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

Verified

pypi attestation

OSSF Scorecard

4.6 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 13, 2026

Signed Commits

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests 0

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 0

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 5

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 10

Vulnerabilities 10

Is Opentargets MCP safe?

Opentargets MCP has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does Opentargets MCP publish package provenance?

Yes. Opentargets MCP's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.

Does Opentargets MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Opentargets MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.6/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Opentargets MCP actively maintained?

Slowing down. Last push was 121 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.

What license does Opentargets MCP use?

Opentargets MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Opentargets MCP's commits signed?

9% of the last 100 commits to Opentargets MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Opentargets MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

OpenAI

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Opentargets MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-13

Activity Went Stale

No commits for 90 days

Maintain Opentargets MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Opentargets MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-11

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#652 → #664)

2026-09-09

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#634 → #646)

2026-09-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#622 → #634)

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 43 spots (#579 → #622)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 73 spots (#500 → #573)

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 31 spots (#469 → #500)

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 22 spots (#447 → #469)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#434 → #447)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#420 → #434)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 34 spots (#386 → #420)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank rose 14 spots (#400 → #386)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#387 → #400)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#375 → #386)

2026-08-26

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 4.6/10

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank rose 87 spots (#462 → #375)

2026-08-26

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 9.5pts (50.1 → 59.6)

2026-08-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#446 → #462)

2026-08-22

Rank Moved

Rank rose 14 spots (#461 → #447)

2026-08-19

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#449 → #461)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 11 spots (#459 → #448)

2026-08-13

Activity Went Stale

No commits for 90 days

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#433 → #447)

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 13 spots (#446 → #433)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#425 → #443)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #424

GitHub → PyPI: opentargets-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/opentargets-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/opentargets-mcp)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/opentargets-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/opentargets-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON