updated 2026-08-17 00:02 UTC

SimpleEnglish

AminBlg/SimpleEnglish

Agent skill: make LLMs write docs in ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical

Agent Skills Python Grade D Listed MIT
23.0/100
Rank #88 of 159
Compare SimpleEnglish

How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade D · 1/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-07 · 10d ago
Recent change
New

Is SimpleEnglish safe? SimpleEnglish scores 23.0/100 (Grade D), ranked #88 of 159 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage D (1 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 46% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-07. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Agent Skills

#86 Claude Code Workflows — 23.2 (D) → #87 Designer Skills — 23.0 (D) → #89 Claude Obsidian — 23.0 (D) → #90 Novel To Game — 23.0 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-08-16
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #91
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for SimpleEnglish View Agent Skills Report missing data
70.2
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#88
In Agent Skills

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage D is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (1 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-17 00:02 UTC · Repo last pushed 10 days ago

Activity & Reach

Stars
2.4k
Forks
91
Last Push
2026-08-07
10 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
22
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
▲3
was #91

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Agent Skills

23.0 / 100 · 50.0% confidence

SimpleEnglish Agent Skills average (159 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
2.3 / 25
in line with avg 2.7
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.6 below avg 11.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
8.5 / 17
in line with avg 8.5
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
16.8 / 20
1.6 above avg 15.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
8.1 / 20
1.1 below avg 9.2

Activity Inputs

70.2 / 100
StarsRepository reach
20.3 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
23.6 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
17.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
9.1 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
—
Not available
Signed Commits
46%
of last 100 commits verified

Is SimpleEnglish safe?

Public trust evidence for SimpleEnglish is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does SimpleEnglish publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for SimpleEnglish. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does SimpleEnglish have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for SimpleEnglish. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is SimpleEnglish actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 10 days ago.
What license does SimpleEnglish use?
SimpleEnglish ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are SimpleEnglish's commits signed?
45% of the last 100 commits to SimpleEnglish are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
medium confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain SimpleEnglish?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores SimpleEnglish from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Listed 1
2026-08-16
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #91
GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 23.0 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/simpleenglish.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/simpleenglish)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/simpleenglish"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/simpleenglish.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON