updated 2026-10-11 00:07 UTC

twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill

Repository

SwiftUI agent skill for Claude Code, Codex, and other AI tools.

Agent Skills Listed MIT

Is twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 2.8 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 67%
Last push 4d ago
Compare twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill

How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill scores 49.5/100 (Grade D), ranked #246 of 371 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.8/10; 67% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-10-07. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Already done? Suggest a correctionAdd the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and, for skills, AST02 Supply Chain Compromise.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/twostraws/SwiftUI-Agent-Skill, MIT, last pushed 2026-10-07. 67% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Weak

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 2.8/10 (scanned Oct 7, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review2
    • Branch Protection0
    • Signed Releasesn/a
    • Dangerous Workflown/a
    • Token Permissionsn/a
    • Pinned Dependenciesn/a
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 0
    CI-Tests 0
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 2
    Contributors 3
    Dangerous-Workflow -1
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 0
    Packaging -1
    Pinned-Dependencies -1
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 0
    Signed-Releases -1
    Token-Permissions -1
    Vulnerabilities 10

  3. Published packages None

    No registry package. twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-08-29 OSSF Scorecard: 2.8/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads (missing)
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read the skill’s instructions for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you install it, such as Cisco Skill Scanner.

How twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill compares in Agent Skills

  1. #244 Cc Fleet 49.6 +0.1
  2. #245 Video Shotcraft 49.6 +0.1
  3. #246 twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill 49.5 this agent
  4. #247 Sage 49.3 −0.2
  5. #248 Claude Code Skills 49.2 −0.3

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill’s 49.5.

Where the 49.5 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

49.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill Agent Skills average (371 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
6.8 / 25
1.0 below avg 7.8
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.6 below avg 11.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
10.9 / 17
1.2 below avg 12.1
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
12.3 / 20
1.8 below avg 14.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
9.0 / 20
in line with avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-10-08
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
2026-10-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#228 → #242)
2026-10-07
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 2.8/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill View Agent Skills Report missing data
61.6
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#246
In Agent Skills

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-10-11 00:07 UTC · Repo last pushed 4 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
5.7k
Forks
200
Last Push
2026-10-07
4 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
1?
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
8
Rank Change
▼2
was #244

Analysis

Activity Inputs

61.6 / 100
StarsRepository reach
22.5 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.4 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
3.8 / 25
CommunityFork signal
10.7 / 20

Common questions about twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill

Public trust evidence for twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 2.8/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 4 day(s).
What license does twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill use?
twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill's commits signed?
66% of the last 100 commits to twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
medium confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-10-07
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

Maintain twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores twostraws · SwiftUI Agent Skill from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 12HVTrust 3Listed 2Grade 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1Surface 1Surface 1Score 1Fresh 1
2026-10-08
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
2026-10-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#228 → #242)
2026-10-07
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed
2026-10-07
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-10-07
Rank Moved
Rank rose 106 spots (#334 → #228)
2026-10-07
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 12.5pts (38.0 → 50.5)
2026-10-07
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 27pts (34 → 62)
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#305 → #329)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#295 → #305)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 11.6pts (27.2 → 38.8)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #295
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#280 → #291)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#239 → #250)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#220 → #233)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#208 → #220)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#193 → #208)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#176 → #193)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 32 spots (#144 → #176)
2026-08-29
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 2.8/10
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank rose 150 spots (#294 → #144)
2026-08-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 23.3pts (17.2 → 40.5)
2026-08-26
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #284
GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 49.5 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/twostraws-swiftui-agent-skill.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/twostraws-swiftui-agent-skill)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/twostraws-swiftui-agent-skill"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/twostraws-swiftui-agent-skill.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON