Is Serena safe to use?

Serena has an HVTrust score of 65.2/100 (Grade B), ranked #459 of 1328 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Serena?

Serena scores 65.2/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 29.6k GitHub stars and is categorized under Protocols & Tool Integration.

Serena

oraios/serena

A powerful MCP toolkit for coding, providing semantic retrieval and editing capabilities - the IDE for your agent

Protocols & Tool Integration Python Grade B Listed NOASSERTION

65.2/100

Rank #459 of 1328

Compare Serena

How does it stack up against its Protocols & Tool Integration neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-09-19 · 1d ago

Recent change

Rank +4

Is Serena safe? Serena scores 65.2/100 (Grade B), ranked #459 of 1328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 6.5/10; 15% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-19. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Protocols & Tool Integration

#22 Agent Gateway — 66.0 (B) → #23 Model Context Protocol / MCP — 65.8 (B) → #25 arcade-mcp — 64.8 (C) → #26 mcp-use — 64.7 (C) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-18

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 42 spots (#411 → #453)

2026-09-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 40 spots (#451 → #411)

2026-09-16

License Changed

License changed from MIT to NOASSERTION

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 6.5/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Serena View Protocols & Tool Integration Report missing data

92.1

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#24

In Protocols & Tool Integration

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-20

Activity & Reach

Stars

29.6k

Forks

2.0k

Last Push

2026-09-19

yesterday

Commits (4 wk)

105

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼1

was #458

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Protocols & Tool Integration

65.2 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Serena Protocols & Tool Integration average (61 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

8.9 / 25

1.6 below avg 10.5

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.8 below avg 11.6

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

14.0 / 17

1.2 above avg 12.8

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

19.9 / 20

5.9 above avg 14.0

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

10.7 / 20

in line with avg 10.6

Activity Inputs

92.1 / 100

StarsRepository reach

26.8 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.9 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

25 / 25

CommunityFork signal

15.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

6.5 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 13, 2026

Signed Commits

15%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 3

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 7

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 10

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 8

Vulnerabilities 0

Is Serena safe?

Serena has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does Serena publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Serena. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Serena have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Serena has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 6.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Serena actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does Serena use?

Serena ships under NOASSERTION. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Serena's commits signed?

15% of the last 100 commits to Serena are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Serena appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

2 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Extensions

Extension based plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain Serena?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Serena from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-18

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 42 spots (#411 → #453)

2026-09-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 40 spots (#451 → #411)

2026-09-16

License Changed

License changed from MIT to NOASSERTION

2026-09-14

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → B

2026-09-13

Grade Changed

Trust grade B → C

2026-09-12

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → B

2026-09-11

Grade Changed

Trust grade B → C

2026-09-11

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#446 → #457)

2026-09-09

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#430 → #441)

2026-09-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 23 spots (#407 → #430)

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 47 spots (#360 → #407)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 49 spots (#304 → #353)

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#290 → #304)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 29 spots (#253 → #282)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank rose 19 spots (#272 → #253)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#260 → #272)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 22 spots (#229 → #251)

2026-08-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#212 → #227)

2026-08-22

Rank Moved

Rank rose 17 spots (#230 → #213)

2026-08-19

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#210 → #224)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 13 spots (#223 → #210)

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#199 → #217)

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 18 spots (#217 → #199)

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 37 spots (#164 → #201)

2026-07-16

Rank Moved

Rank rose 10 spots (#173 → #163)

2026-07-14

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#156 → #167)

2026-07-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 21 spots (#135 → #156)

2026-06-28

Rank Moved

Rank rose 11 spots (#164 → #153)

2026-06-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#151 → #164)

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/serena.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/serena)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/serena"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/serena.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Protocols & Tool Integration

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON