Scira MCP Chat
A minimalistic MCP client with a good feature set.
Is Scira MCP Chat safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
Compare Scira MCP Chat
How does it stack up against its Protocols & Tool Integration neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Scira MCP Chat scores 30.7/100 (Grade D), ranked #1324 of 1374 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 1.8/10; 20% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2025-12-11. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Scira MCP Chat could raise its score
Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.
- Raise the OSSF Scorecard from 1.8 to 9.0lowest checks: Branch-Protection 0, CII-Best-Practices 0, Dependency-Update-Tool 0 +15.1 → 45.8 D · #54 of 63
- Sign every commit20% signed today +4.1 → 34.8 D · #61 of 63
Chain of custody
Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Scira MCP Chat and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.
-
Source Partly signed
github.com/zaidmukaddam/scira-mcp-chat, Apache-2.0, last pushed 2025-12-11. 20% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.
-
Review and release Weak
OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 1.8/10 (scanned Nov 8, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:
- Code Review1
- Branch Protection0
- Signed Releasesn/a
- Dangerous Workflown/a
- Token Permissionsn/a
- Pinned Dependenciesn/a
All 18 Scorecard checks
Binary-Artifacts 10Branch-Protection 0CI-Tests 2CII-Best-Practices 0Code-Review 1Contributors 6Dangerous-Workflow -1Dependency-Update-Tool 0Fuzzing 0License 10Maintained 0Packaging -1Pinned-Dependencies -1SAST 0Security-Policy 0Signed-Releases -1Token-Permissions -1Vulnerabilities 0 -
Published packages None
No registry package. Scira MCP Chat is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.
Changes to this chain
- 2026-09-02 OSSF Scorecard: 1.8/10
Evidence behind this score
Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.
- GitHub repository data
- Package downloads (missing)
- Supply-chain checks
- Public actions (missing)
- Community mentions (missing)
Verify this score yourself
Every build re-issues Scira MCP Chat’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.
What this score doesn’t check
It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.
How Scira MCP Chat compares in Protocols & Tool Integration
- #59 CrewAI tools 36.1 +5.4
- #60 MCP Hub for Neovim 36.1 +5.4
- #61 TUUI 33.9 +3.2
- #62 Scira MCP Chat 30.7 this agent
- #63 MCP Hub 30.4 −0.3
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Scira MCP Chat’s 30.7.
Where the 30.7 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the Protocols & Tool Integration average
30.7 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceScira MCP Chat Protocols & Tool Integration average (63 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
28.3 / 100Common questions about Scira MCP Chat
Does Scira MCP Chat publish package provenance?
Does Scira MCP Chat have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Scira MCP Chat actively maintained?
What license does Scira MCP Chat use?
Are Scira MCP Chat's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- database
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Scira MCP Chat's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Scira MCP Chat?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Scira MCP Chat from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/scira-mcp-chat)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/scira-mcp-chat"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/scira-mcp-chat.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in Protocols & Tool Integration
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON