CrewAI tools

Extend the capabilities of your CrewAI agents with Tools

Protocols & Tool Integration Python Grade D Needs review MIT
47.0/100
Rank #498 of 1283
Compare CrewAI tools

How does it stack up against its Protocols & Tool Integration neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Needs review
Evidence coverage
Grade A · 4/5 signals
Last push
2025-10-23 · 292d ago
Recent change
Warning +4

Is CrewAI tools safe? CrewAI tools scores 47.0/100 (Grade D), ranked #498 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage A (4 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.3/10; 93% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2025-10-23. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Active listing, but review is needed
  • [5.1] repository is archived

Ranked neighbours in Protocols & Tool Integration

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-08-10
Warning Issued
Warning: eligibility issues detected
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#482 → #499)
2026-08-09
Warning Cleared
Warning cleared: eligibility issues resolved
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 292 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
Review Flags
[5.1] repository is archived
31.7
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#33

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage A is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (4 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-11 20:02 UTC · Repo last pushed 292 days ago — may be stale

Activity & Reach

Stars
1.5k
Forks
547
Last Push
2025-10-23
292 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
2,660,001
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
3
Open Issues
72
Rank Change
▲1
was #499

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Protocols & Tool Integration

47.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

CrewAI tools Protocols & Tool Integration average (57 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
10.0 / 25
1.4 above avg 8.6
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.9 below avg 11.7
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.2 / 17
0.8 above avg 11.4
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
0 / 20
13.8 below avg 13.8
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
16.2 / 20
5.8 above avg 10.4

Activity Inputs

31.7 / 100
StarsRepository reach
19.0 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
0.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
12.7 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
4.3 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 11, 2026
Signed Commits
93%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 6
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 9
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 0
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 7
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is CrewAI tools safe?

Public trust evidence for CrewAI tools is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does CrewAI tools publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for CrewAI tools. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does CrewAI tools have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
CrewAI tools has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is CrewAI tools actively maintained?
Stale. The repository has not been pushed to in 292 days. Consider whether the project is still being maintained.
What license does CrewAI tools use?
CrewAI tools ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are CrewAI tools's commits signed?
93% of the last 100 commits to CrewAI tools are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Implemented
CrewAI tools appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
8 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
4 tags
Broad capability areas detected.
  • browser
  • code
  • database
  • search
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
low confidence
Unknown
Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to CrewAI tools's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-07
Drift Warning Cleared
Provenance drift warning cleared (now: unknown)
2026-06-05
Drift Warning Raised
Package-provenance drift warning: package metadata no longer clearly points at this repo

Maintain CrewAI tools?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores CrewAI tools from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 9Warning Issued 6Warning Cleared 5HVTrust 2Listed 1Grade 1Scorecard 1Drift 1Drift 1
2026-08-10
Warning Issued
Warning: eligibility issues detected
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#482 → #499)
2026-08-09
Warning Cleared
Warning cleared: eligibility issues resolved
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 125 spots (#352 → #477)
2026-08-07
Drift Warning Cleared
Provenance drift warning cleared (now: unknown)
2026-07-15
Warning Issued
Warning: eligibility issues detected
2026-07-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#330 → #354)
2026-07-14
Warning Cleared
Warning cleared: eligibility issues resolved
2026-07-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#312 → #330)
2026-07-13
Warning Issued
Warning: eligibility issues detected
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 37 spots (#275 → #312)
2026-07-12
Warning Cleared
Warning cleared: eligibility issues resolved
2026-06-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 33 spots (#205 → #238)
2026-06-23
Warning Issued
Warning: eligibility issues detected
2026-06-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#191 → #205)
2026-06-18
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#161 → #171)
2026-06-11
Warning Cleared
Warning cleared: eligibility issues resolved
2026-06-10
Warning Issued
Warning: eligibility issues detected
2026-06-06
Warning Cleared
Warning cleared: eligibility issues resolved
2026-06-05
Drift Warning Raised
Package-provenance drift warning: package metadata no longer clearly points at this repo
2026-06-05
Warning Issued
Warning: eligibility issues detected
2026-06-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#113 → #130)
2026-05-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 10.0pts (36.5 → 46.5)
2026-05-27
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.3/10
2026-05-27
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-05-27
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 17.1pts (8.6 → 25.7)
2026-05-25
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #156

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 47.0 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/crewai-tools.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/crewai-tools)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/crewai-tools"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/crewai-tools.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Protocols & Tool Integration

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON