updated 2026-08-19 06:02 UTC

QwenPaw

agentscope-ai/QwenPaw

Your Personal AI Assistant; easy to install, deploy on your own machine or on the cloud; supports multiple chat apps wit

Agent Frameworks Python Grade D Listed Apache-2.0
25.0/100
Rank #845 of 1308
Compare QwenPaw

How does it stack up against its Agent Frameworks neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade D · 1/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-19 · 0d ago
Recent change
Rank +3

Is QwenPaw safe? QwenPaw scores 25.0/100 (Grade D), ranked #845 of 1308 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage D (1 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-19. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Agent Frameworks

#88 JARVIS / HuggingGPT — 26.5 (D) → #89 aeon — 25.6 (D) → #91 Chorus — 24.7 (D) → #92 trpc-agent-go — 23.9 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#829 → #847)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank rose 104 spots (#933 → #829)
2026-08-12
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: marketplace → declared
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for QwenPaw View Agent Frameworks Report missing data
93.4
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#90
In Agent Frameworks

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage D is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (1 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-19 06:02 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-19

Activity & Reach

Stars
34.0k
Forks
3.0k
Last Push
2026-08-19
today
Commits (4 wk)
301
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
680
Rank Change
▼7
was #838

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Agent Frameworks

25.0 / 100 · 50.0% confidence

QwenPaw Agent Frameworks average (119 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
5.0 / 25
3.1 below avg 8.1
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.8 below avg 11.6
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
8.5 / 17
3.0 below avg 11.5
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
20.0 / 20
5.6 above avg 14.4
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
10.9 / 20
in line with avg 11.3

Activity Inputs

93.4 / 100
StarsRepository reach
27.2 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
16.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
—
Not available
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified

Is QwenPaw safe?

Public trust evidence for QwenPaw is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does QwenPaw publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for QwenPaw. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does QwenPaw have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for QwenPaw. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is QwenPaw actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does QwenPaw use?
QwenPaw ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are QwenPaw's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to QwenPaw are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Declared
MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
3 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
  • browser
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to QwenPaw's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-12
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: marketplace → declared

Maintain QwenPaw?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores QwenPaw from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 5Listed 1Surface 1
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#829 → #847)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank rose 104 spots (#933 → #829)
2026-08-12
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: marketplace → declared
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 83 spots (#850 → #933)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 45 spots (#805 → #850)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 335 spots (#443 → #778)
2026-08-06
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #446
GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 25.0 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/qwenpaw.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/qwenpaw)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/qwenpaw"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/qwenpaw.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Frameworks

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON