Postman MCP Server

Postman MCP Server — connect AI agents (Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code Copilot, Gemini CLI) to your Postman collections, OpenAPI specs, and environments via Model Context Protocol (MCP)

MCP Servers TypeScript Listed Apache-2.0

Is Postman MCP Server safe? Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

OSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10
Provenance Attested
Signed commits 40%
Last push 11d ago
Advisories None known
Compare Postman MCP Server
Suggest a correction

In detail: Postman MCP Server scores 78.3/100 (Grade B), ranked #216 of 1374 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.0/10; 40% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (@postman/postman-mcp-server); last pushed 2026-10-30. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Postman MCP Server could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Postman MCP Server and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/postmanlabs/postman-mcp-server, Apache-2.0, last pushed 2026-10-30. 40% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Mixed

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 5.0/10 (scanned Oct 27, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review0
    • Branch Protection3
    • Signed Releases0
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions9
    • Pinned Dependencies3
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 3
    CI-Tests 10
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 0
    Contributors 10
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging 10
    Pinned-Dependencies 3
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 10
    Signed-Releases 0
    Token-Permissions 9
    Vulnerabilities 0
  3. Published packages Linked and attested

  4. What you install today No known advisories

    Latest release checked: @postman/postman-mcp-server 2.15.0. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-11-09).

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-09-23 Package provenance attestation detected
  • 2026-08-29 OSSF Scorecard: 4.6/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Postman MCP Server’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How Postman MCP Server compares in MCP Servers

  1. #121 Aiven MCP 78.4 +0.1
  2. #122 Better Notion MCP 78.3 ±0
  3. #123 Postman MCP Server 78.3 this agent
  4. #124 Email MCP 78.2 −0.1
  5. #125 Universal Screenshot MCP 78.2 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Postman MCP Server’s 78.3.

Where the 78.3 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

78.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Postman MCP Server MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
15.8 / 25
5.0 above avg 10.8
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.3 above avg 13.7
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.8 / 17
in line with avg 12.3
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
15.3 / 20
3.1 above avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
11.4 / 20
3.8 above avg 7.6

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.
Recent Changes
2026-11-08
Rank Moved
Rank rose 29 spots (#241 → #212)
2026-10-29
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#238 → #227)
2026-10-15
Rank Moved
Rank rose 14 spots (#237 → #223)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.0/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Compare with another agent
View MCP Servers Report missing data
60.2
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#123

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-11-10 04:07 UTC · Repo last pushed 11 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-11-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
327
Forks
87
Last Push
2026-10-30
11 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
9
Downloads (7d)
10,103
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
5
Rank Change
▲1
was #217

Analysis

Activity Inputs

60.2 / 100
StarsRepository reach
15.1 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
23.5 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
12.5 / 25
CommunityFork signal
9.0 / 20

Common questions about Postman MCP Server

Public supply-chain signals for Postman MCP Server are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but Postman MCP Server carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.
Does Postman MCP Server publish package provenance?
Yes. Postman MCP Server's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Postman MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Postman MCP Server has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.0/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Postman MCP Server actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 11 days ago.
What license does Postman MCP Server use?
Postman MCP Server ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Postman MCP Server's commits signed?
40% of the last 100 commits to Postman MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Postman MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
low confidence
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Postman MCP Server's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected

Maintain Postman MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Postman MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 20HVTrust 5Grade 2Scorecard 1Score 1Delisted 1Listed 1Provenance 1MCP 1
2026-11-08
Rank Moved
Rank rose 29 spots (#241 → #212)
2026-10-29
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#238 → #227)
2026-10-15
Rank Moved
Rank rose 14 spots (#237 → #223)
2026-10-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 50 spots (#177 → #227)
2026-10-08
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 3.2pts (78.6 → 75.4)
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 618 spots (#773 → #155)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 49.5pts (29.5 → 79.0)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #773
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#153 → #163)
2026-09-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#161 → #150)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank rose 79 spots (#237 → #158)
2026-09-08
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 4.8pts (73.5 → 78.3)
2026-09-08
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 8pts (54 → 63)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#214 → #237)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 54 spots (#161 → #215)
2026-09-03
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 635 spots (#791 → #156)
2026-09-03
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 27.1pts (47.0 → 74.1)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 45 spots (#746 → #791)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#719 → #746)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 33 spots (#686 → #719)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#663 → #686)
2026-08-29
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.6/10
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank rose 102 spots (#765 → #663)
2026-08-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 6.4pts (40.8 → 47.2)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 28 spots (#737 → #765)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#714 → #737)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 98 spots (#616 → #714)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#601 → #612)

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 78.3 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/postman-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/postman-mcp-server)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/postman-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/postman-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON