Is Email MCP safe to use?

Email MCP has an HVTrust score of 36.3/100 (Grade D), ranked #679 of 1283 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Email MCP?

Email MCP scores 36.3/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 90 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

Email MCP

codefuturist/email-mcp

Email MCP server with full IMAP + SMTP support — read, search, send, manage, and organize email from any AI assistant vi

MCP Servers TypeScript Grade D Listed LGPL-3.0

36.3/100

Rank #679 of 1283

Compare Email MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-05-20 · 84d ago

Recent change

Rank +1

Is Email MCP safe? Email MCP scores 36.3/100 (Grade D), ranked #679 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 6% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-05-20. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#295 Music Studio — 36.5 (D) → #296 MCP Odoo — 36.4 (D) → #298 Appwrite MCP — 36.1 (D) → #299 Better Telegram MCP — 36.0 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.

Recent Changes

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 30 spots (#651 → #681)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #649

Maintainer Checklist

Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 84 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Email MCP View MCP Servers Report missing data

32.8

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#297

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-05-20

84 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▲2

was #681

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

36.3 / 100 · 67.0% confidence

Email MCP MCP Servers average (761 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

7.8 / 25

2.8 above avg 5.0

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

18.0 / 18

4.7 above avg 13.3

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

8.5 / 17

in line with avg 8.8

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

6.4 / 20

6.0 below avg 12.4

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

4.7 / 20

1.1 below avg 5.8

Activity Inputs

32.8 / 100

StarsRepository reach

11.8 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

13.3 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

0.0 / 25

CommunityFork signal

7.5 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

Verified

npm attestation

OSSF Scorecard

—

Not available

Signed Commits

of last 100 commits verified

Is Email MCP safe?

Public trust evidence for Email MCP is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does Email MCP publish package provenance?

Yes. Email MCP's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.

Does Email MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for Email MCP. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.

Is Email MCP actively maintained?

Slowing down. Last push was 84 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.

What license does Email MCP use?

Email MCP ships under LGPL-3.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Email MCP's commits signed?

6% of the last 100 commits to Email MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Email MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain Email MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Email MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 30 spots (#651 → #681)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #649

GitHub → npm: @codefuturist/email-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/email-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/email-mcp)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/email-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/email-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON