updated 2026-09-08 15:03 UTC

PostgreSQL performance Tuner MCP Server

isdaniel/pgtuner_mcp

provides AI-powered PostgreSQL performance tuning capabilities.

MCP Servers Python Grade D Listed Apache-2.0
43.9/100
Rank #1060 of 1328
Compare PostgreSQL performance Tuner MCP Server

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-06-02 · 98d ago
Recent change
Rank +7

Is PostgreSQL performance Tuner MCP Server safe? PostgreSQL performance Tuner MCP Server scores 43.9/100 (Grade D), ranked #1060 of 1328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.2/10; 5% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-06-02. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#616 Ux MCP Server — 43.9 (D) → #617 Excel MCP Server — 43.9 (D) → #619 Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio — 43.9 (D) → #620 MCP Ip2location Io — 43.9 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#1043 → #1060)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 38 spots (#1005 → #1043)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank rose 13 spots (#1018 → #1005)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.2/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 98 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for PostgreSQL performance Tuner MCP Server View MCP Servers Report missing data
23.9
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#618
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-08 15:03 UTC · Repo last pushed 98 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-08

Activity & Reach

Stars
29
Forks
5
Last Push
2026-06-02
98 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
178
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
▼17
was #1043

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

43.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

PostgreSQL performance Tuner MCP Server MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
4.2 / 25
5.7 below avg 9.9
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.6 below avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.2 / 17
0.8 below avg 12.0
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
5.5 / 20
6.7 below avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
6.5 / 20
in line with avg 6.9

Activity Inputs

23.9 / 100
StarsRepository reach
8.9 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
11.4 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
3.6 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
3.2 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 30, 2026
Signed Commits
5%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 0
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 1
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 10

Is PostgreSQL performance Tuner MCP Server safe?

Public trust evidence for PostgreSQL performance Tuner MCP Server is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does PostgreSQL performance Tuner MCP Server publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for PostgreSQL performance Tuner MCP Server. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does PostgreSQL performance Tuner MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
PostgreSQL performance Tuner MCP Server has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.2/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is PostgreSQL performance Tuner MCP Server actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 98 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does PostgreSQL performance Tuner MCP Server use?
PostgreSQL performance Tuner MCP Server ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are PostgreSQL performance Tuner MCP Server's commits signed?
4% of the last 100 commits to PostgreSQL performance Tuner MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Implemented
PostgreSQL performance Tuner MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
medium confidence
1 tags
Broad capability areas detected.
  • database
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to PostgreSQL performance Tuner MCP Server's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-31
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days

Maintain PostgreSQL performance Tuner MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores PostgreSQL performance Tuner MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 17Listed 1HVTrust 1Scorecard 1Stale 1
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#1043 → #1060)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 38 spots (#1005 → #1043)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank rose 13 spots (#1018 → #1005)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 42 spots (#976 → #1018)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 29 spots (#947 → #976)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 58 spots (#889 → #947)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 44 spots (#845 → #889)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 32 spots (#813 → #845)
2026-08-31
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 38 spots (#775 → #813)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#751 → #775)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 51 spots (#700 → #751)
2026-08-28
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.2/10
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank rose 258 spots (#958 → #700)
2026-08-28
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 17.1pts (26.7 → 43.8)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#931 → #958)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 113 spots (#818 → #931)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#798 → #815)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#786 → #798)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 44 spots (#748 → #792)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #745
GitHub → PyPI: pgtuner-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 43.9 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/postgresql-performance-tuner-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/postgresql-performance-tuner-mcp-server)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/postgresql-performance-tuner-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/postgresql-performance-tuner-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON