Augments MCP Server
Comprehensive MCP server providing real-time framework documentation access for Claude Code with intelligent caching, multi-source integration, and context-aware assistance.
Is Augments MCP Server safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
Compare Augments MCP Server
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Augments MCP Server scores 38.4/100 (Grade D), ranked #1193 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.8/10; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-03-13. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Augments MCP Server compares in MCP Servers
- #709 Terminal MCP Server 38.5 +0.1
- #710 OneTool MCP 38.5 +0.1
- #711 Augments MCP Server 38.4 this agent
- #712 Paypal MCP Server 38.3 −0.1
- #713 Ui Annotator MCP 38.0 −0.4
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Augments MCP Server’s 38.4.
Where the 38.4 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
38.4 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceAugments MCP Server MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
18.7 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about Augments MCP Server
Does Augments MCP Server publish package provenance?
Does Augments MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Augments MCP Server actively maintained?
What license does Augments MCP Server use?
Are Augments MCP Server's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Augments MCP Server's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Augments MCP Server?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Augments MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/augments-mcp-server)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/augments-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/augments-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON