Pinme

Deploy Your Frontend in a Single Command. Claude Code Skills supported.

Agent Skills TypeScript Listed MIT

Is Pinme safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 13%
Last push 14d ago
Compare Pinme

How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: Pinme scores 51.3/100 (Grade C), ranked #221 of 351 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.2/10; 13% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-12. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Pinme compares in Agent Skills

  1. #219 Ktx 51.4 +0.1
  2. #220 Recall 51.3 ±0
  3. #221 Pinme 51.3 this agent
  4. #222 Sage 51.2 −0.1
  5. #223 Skillgrade 51.0 −0.3

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Pinme’s 51.3.

Where the 51.3 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

51.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Pinme Agent Skills average (351 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
5.9 / 25
2.2 below avg 8.1
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.6 below avg 11.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.1 / 17
in line with avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
11.1 / 20
3.1 below avg 14.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
11.7 / 20
2.7 above avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#202 → #223)
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Supabase
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.2/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
55.9
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#221

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 14 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
3.7k
Forks
277
Last Push
2026-09-12
14 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
206
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
4
Rank Change
▲2
was #223

Analysis

Activity Inputs

55.9 / 100
StarsRepository reach
21.4 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
23.1 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
11.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
4.2 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 23, 2026
Signed Commits
13%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests 5
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 5
Contributors 0
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 10
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 3
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about Pinme

Public trust evidence for Pinme is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Pinme publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Pinme. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Pinme have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Pinme has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.2/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Pinme actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 14 days ago.
What license does Pinme use?
Pinme ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Pinme's commits signed?
13% of the last 100 commits to Pinme are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
medium confidence
1 tags
Broad capability areas detected.
  • filesystem
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
low confidence
Unknown
Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Pinme's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Supabase

Maintain Pinme?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Pinme from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 12Grade 4HVTrust 3Listed 2Scorecard 1Score 1Delisted 1Surface 1
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#202 → #223)
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Supabase
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 100 spots (#300 → #200)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 25.0pts (26.4 → 51.4)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #300
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-20
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#205 → #193)
2026-09-12
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 37 spots (#228 → #191)
2026-09-12
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 3.2pts (48.1 → 51.3)
2026-09-12
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 7pts (51 → 58)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#217 → #228)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#172 → #184)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#143 → #159)
2026-08-31
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → D
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#116 → #134)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#95 → #116)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#77 → #95)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#60 → #77)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#44 → #60)
2026-08-26
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.2/10
2026-08-26
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-08-26
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 22.7pts (27.6 → 50.3)
2026-08-11
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #32

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 51.3 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/pinme.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/pinme)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/pinme"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/pinme.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON