pentest-ai

Open-source AI pentester that proves every finding. Machine oracles re-run each exploit; verified bugs ship a proof caps

Security & Guardrails Python Grade C Listed MIT
54.4/100
Rank #796 of 1328
Compare pentest-ai

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-09-13 · 7d ago
Recent change
Rank +3

Is pentest-ai safe? pentest-ai scores 54.4/100 (Grade C), ranked #796 of 1328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.5/10; 15% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-13. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Security & Guardrails

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#778 → #793)
2026-09-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 34 spots (#744 → #778)
2026-09-13
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Anthropic, OpenAI
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.5/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
68.9
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#18

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-20 18:03 UTC · Repo last pushed 7 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-20

Activity & Reach

Stars
1.7k
Forks
314
Last Push
2026-09-13
7 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
12
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
▼1
was #795

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Security & Guardrails

54.4 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

pentest-ai Security & Guardrails average (22 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
6.4 / 25
3.8 below avg 10.2
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
1.3 below avg 12.1
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.3 / 17
in line with avg 12.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
16.0 / 20
in line with avg 15.5
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
7.7 / 20
2.2 below avg 9.9

Activity Inputs

68.9 / 100
StarsRepository reach
19.4 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
13.9 / 25
CommunityFork signal
11.6 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
4.5 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 12, 2026
Signed Commits
15%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 4
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 0
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 2
SAST 0
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is pentest-ai safe?

Public trust evidence for pentest-ai is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does pentest-ai publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for pentest-ai. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does pentest-ai have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
pentest-ai has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is pentest-ai actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 7 day(s).
What license does pentest-ai use?
pentest-ai ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are pentest-ai's commits signed?
15% of the last 100 commits to pentest-ai are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
pentest-ai appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
2 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
medium confidence
1 tags
Broad capability areas detected.
  • browser
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to pentest-ai's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-13
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Anthropic, OpenAI
2026-08-12
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none
2026-08-12
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Cohere, DeepSeek, Groq, OpenRouter

Maintain pentest-ai?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores pentest-ai from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 25Surface 2Listed 1Surface 1Score 1HVTrust 1Grade 1Scorecard 1
2026-09-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#778 → #793)
2026-09-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 34 spots (#744 → #778)
2026-09-13
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Anthropic, OpenAI
2026-09-13
Rank Moved
Rank rose 75 spots (#818 → #743)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#803 → #821)
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#793 → #807)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#780 → #793)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 43 spots (#737 → #780)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#724 → #737)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 71 spots (#653 → #724)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#628 → #653)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#607 → #628)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 10 spots (#617 → #607)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#594 → #617)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 33 spots (#561 → #594)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#527 → #558)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#506 → #519)
2026-08-26
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.5/10
2026-08-26
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 511 spots (#1017 → #506)
2026-08-26
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 31.5pts (21.4 → 52.9)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#1007 → #1018)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#1005 → #1015)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 19 spots (#1021 → #1002)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank rose 63 spots (#1084 → #1021)
2026-08-16
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 5pts (67 → 72)
2026-08-14
Rank Moved
Rank rose 15 spots (#1093 → #1078)
2026-08-12
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none
2026-08-12
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Cohere, DeepSeek, Groq, OpenRouter
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 76 spots (#1168 → #1092)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 69 spots (#1096 → #1165)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 521 spots (#495 → #1016)
2026-08-06
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #499

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 54.4 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/pentest-ai.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/pentest-ai)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/pentest-ai"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/pentest-ai.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Security & Guardrails

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON