open-kritt

Open-source, self-hosted AI vulnerability research tool that orchestrates agents to find and validate security issues in

Security & Guardrails JavaScript Grade C Listed AGPL-3.0
56.1/100
Rank #568 of 1320
Compare open-kritt

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-24 · 11d ago
Recent change
Rank +10

Is open-kritt safe? open-kritt scores 56.1/100 (Grade C), ranked #568 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.3/10; 38% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-24. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Security & Guardrails

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#552 → #568)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 38 spots (#514 → #552)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#493 → #514)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
75.8
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#11

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-04 14:33 UTC · Repo last pushed 11 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-26 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars
2.1k
Forks
353
Last Push
2026-08-24
11 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
43
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
9
Rank Change
▼16
was #552

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Security & Guardrails

56.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

open-kritt Security & Guardrails average (22 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
7.3 / 25
2.9 below avg 10.2
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
1.3 below avg 12.1
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.2 / 17
in line with avg 12.7
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
17.8 / 20
1.6 above avg 16.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
8.0 / 20
1.6 below avg 9.6

Activity Inputs

75.8 / 100
StarsRepository reach
19.9 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
23.5 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
20.5 / 25
CommunityFork signal
11.9 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
4.3 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 2, 2026
Signed Commits
38%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests 9
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 2
Contributors 0
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 0
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 1
SAST 0
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 4

Is open-kritt safe?

open-kritt has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does open-kritt publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for open-kritt. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does open-kritt have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
open-kritt has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is open-kritt actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 11 days ago.
What license does open-kritt use?
open-kritt ships under AGPL-3.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are open-kritt's commits signed?
37% of the last 100 commits to open-kritt are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain open-kritt?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores open-kritt from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 9Listed 1HVTrust 1Grade 1Scorecard 1
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#552 → #568)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 38 spots (#514 → #552)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#493 → #514)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#474 → #493)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 28 spots (#446 → #474)
2026-08-30
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.3/10
2026-08-30
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 629 spots (#1075 → #446)
2026-08-30
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 33.0pts (24.0 → 57.0)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 49 spots (#1026 → #1075)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 33 spots (#993 → #1026)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#966 → #993)
2026-08-26
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #966

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 56.1 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/open-kritt.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/open-kritt)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/open-kritt"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/open-kritt.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Security & Guardrails

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON