updated 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC

Open Notebook MCP

Epochal-dev/open-notebook-mcp

MCP server for an Open Source implementation of Notebook LM: Open Notebook

MCP Servers Python Listed MIT

Is Open Notebook MCP safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 3.4 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 30%
Last push 278d ago
Compare Open Notebook MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: Open Notebook MCP scores 41.0/100 (Grade D), ranked #1141 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.4/10; 30% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2025-12-22. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Open Notebook MCP compares in MCP Servers

  1. #673 XcodeMCP 41.2 +0.2
  2. #674 Dash MCP Server 41.2 +0.2
  3. #675 Open Notebook MCP 41.0 this agent
  4. #676 Audio File MCP App 41.0 ±0
  5. #677 Balldontlie Api MCP 40.9 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Open Notebook MCP’s 41.0.

Where the 41.0 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

41.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Open Notebook MCP MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
5.8 / 25
4.5 below avg 10.3
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.6 below avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.4 / 17
0.8 below avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
0 / 20
12.1 below avg 12.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
7.0 / 20
in line with avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 122 spots (#1264 → #1142)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 26.4pts (14.6 → 41.0)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.4/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 278 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Open Notebook MCP View MCP Servers Report missing data
15.2
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#675
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 278 days ago — may be stale

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
46
Forks
12
Last Push
2025-12-22
278 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
179
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
5
Rank Change
▲3
was #1144

Analysis

Activity Inputs

15.2 / 100
StarsRepository reach
10.0 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
0.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
5.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
3.4 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 20, 2026
Signed Commits
30%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 5
CI-Tests 0
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 3
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 0
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 9
Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about Open Notebook MCP

Public trust evidence for Open Notebook MCP is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Open Notebook MCP publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Open Notebook MCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Open Notebook MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Open Notebook MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.4/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Open Notebook MCP actively maintained?
Stale. The repository has not been pushed to in 278 days. Consider whether the project is still being maintained.
What license does Open Notebook MCP use?
Open Notebook MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Open Notebook MCP's commits signed?
30% of the last 100 commits to Open Notebook MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Implemented
Open Notebook MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Open Notebook MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain Open Notebook MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Open Notebook MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 22Listed 2HVTrust 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1MCP 1
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 122 spots (#1264 → #1142)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 26.4pts (14.6 → 41.0)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1264
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#1133 → #1143)
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#1109 → #1126)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#1085 → #1104)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#1070 → #1085)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 42 spots (#1028 → #1070)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#1004 → #1028)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 56 spots (#948 → #1004)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 64 spots (#884 → #948)
2026-09-01
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.4/10
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank rose 251 spots (#1135 → #884)
2026-09-01
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 16.7pts (25.0 → 41.7)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#1104 → #1135)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 46 spots (#1058 → #1104)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 50 spots (#1008 → #1058)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#973 → #1008)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#948 → #973)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 107 spots (#841 → #948)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#831 → #841)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 10 spots (#842 → #832)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#828 → #845)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#818 → #828)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#829 → #818)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 46 spots (#783 → #829)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #777
GitHub → PyPI: open-notebook-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 41.0 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/open-notebook-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/open-notebook-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/open-notebook-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/open-notebook-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON