Deployhq MCP Server

DeployHQ MCP Server

MCP Servers TypeScript Listed MIT

Is Deployhq MCP Server safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 5%
Last push 86d ago
Advisories None known
Compare Deployhq MCP Server
Suggest a correction

In detail: Deployhq MCP Server scores 42.9/100 (Grade D), ranked #1163 of 1378 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.3/10; 5% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (deployhq-mcp-server); last pushed 2026-07-22. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Deployhq MCP Server could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Deployhq MCP Server and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/deployhq/deployhq-mcp-server, MIT, last pushed 2026-07-22. 5% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Weak

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 3.3/10 (scanned Oct 15, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review2
    • Branch Protection0
    • Signed Releasesn/a
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies5
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 0
    CI-Tests 10
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 2
    Contributors 3
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 0
    Packaging 10
    Pinned-Dependencies 5
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 0
    Signed-Releases -1
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 0
  3. Published packages Linked, not attested

    Without a build attestation, nothing proves the published files were built from this repository.

  4. What you install today No known advisories

    Latest release checked: deployhq-mcp-server 1.2.2. No published advisory affects it (OSV, checked 2026-10-16).

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-08-26 OSSF Scorecard: 3.3/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Deployhq MCP Server’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How Deployhq MCP Server compares in MCP Servers

  1. #669 GitMCP 43.0 +0.1
  2. #670 Ux MCP Server 42.9 ±0
  3. #671 Deployhq MCP Server 42.9 this agent
  4. #672 Loomle 42.6 −0.3
  5. #673 spreadsheet-kit MCP 42.5 −0.4

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Deployhq MCP Server’s 42.9.

Where the 42.9 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

42.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Deployhq MCP Server MCP Servers average (781 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
4.4 / 25
6.1 below avg 10.5
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.7 below avg 13.5
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.3 / 17
1.0 below avg 12.3
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
6.3 / 20
6.0 below avg 12.3
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
5.1 / 20
2.3 below avg 7.4

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#1119 → #1131)
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 124 spots (#1205 → #1081)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 86 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
22.2
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#671

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-10-16 16:07 UTC · Repo last pushed 86 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-16

Activity & Reach

Stars
13
Forks
2
Last Push
2026-07-22
86 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
53
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
▼2
was #1161

Analysis

Activity Inputs

22.2 / 100
StarsRepository reach
6.9 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
13.1 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
2.2 / 20

Common questions about Deployhq MCP Server

Public trust evidence for Deployhq MCP Server is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Deployhq MCP Server publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Deployhq MCP Server. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Deployhq MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Deployhq MCP Server has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Deployhq MCP Server actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 86 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does Deployhq MCP Server use?
Deployhq MCP Server ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Deployhq MCP Server's commits signed?
5% of the last 100 commits to Deployhq MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Deployhq MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
low confidence
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Deployhq MCP Server's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain Deployhq MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Deployhq MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 20HVTrust 3Listed 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1MCP 1
2026-10-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#1119 → #1131)
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 124 spots (#1205 → #1081)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 25.2pts (18.9 → 44.1)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1205
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#1056 → #1072)
2026-09-12
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#1042 → #1054)
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#1017 → #1036)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 41 spots (#967 → #1008)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#953 → #967)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 49 spots (#904 → #953)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#877 → #904)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 57 spots (#820 → #877)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 296 spots (#1116 → #820)
2026-09-02
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 15.2pts (30.7 → 45.9)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 42 spots (#1074 → #1116)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 28 spots (#1046 → #1074)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 58 spots (#988 → #1046)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 49 spots (#939 → #988)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 34 spots (#905 → #939)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 28 spots (#877 → #905)
2026-08-26
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.3/10
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 307 spots (#1184 → #877)
2026-08-26
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 13.2pts (17.8 → 31.0)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#1153 → #1178)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 69 spots (#1085 → #1154)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1081

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 42.9 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/deployhq-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/deployhq-mcp-server)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/deployhq-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/deployhq-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON