updated 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC

Obsidian MCP Server

cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server

Read, write, search, and surgically edit Obsidian vault notes, tags, and frontmatter via MCP. STDIO or Streamable HTTP.

MCP Servers TypeScript Grade D Listed Apache-2.0
20.3/100
Rank #1055 of 1283
Compare Obsidian MCP Server

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade D · 1/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-02 · 10d ago
Recent change
Rank +1

Is Obsidian MCP Server safe? Obsidian MCP Server scores 20.3/100 (Grade D), ranked #1055 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage D (1 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 95% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-02. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#572 MCP Mermaid — 20.3 (D) → #573 Just MCP Server — 20.3 (D) → #575 Localstack MCP Server — 20.3 (D) → #576 Whoop MCP — 20.3 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 56 spots (#992 → #1048)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #979
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Obsidian MCP Server View MCP Servers Report missing data
62.0
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#574
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage D is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (1 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC · Repo last pushed 10 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars
656
Forks
103
Last Push
2026-08-02
10 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
8?
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
14
Rank Change
▼2
was #1053

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

20.3 / 100 · 40.0% confidence

Obsidian MCP Server MCP Servers average (761 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
4.8 / 25
in line with avg 5.0
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.5 below avg 13.3
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
8.5 / 17
in line with avg 8.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
13.2 / 20
0.8 above avg 12.4
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
6.8 / 20
1.0 above avg 5.8

Activity Inputs

62.0 / 100
StarsRepository reach
16.9 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
23.6 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
11.9 / 25
CommunityFork signal
9.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
—
Not available
Signed Commits
95%
of last 100 commits verified

Is Obsidian MCP Server safe?

Public trust evidence for Obsidian MCP Server is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Obsidian MCP Server publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Obsidian MCP Server. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Obsidian MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for Obsidian MCP Server. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is Obsidian MCP Server actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 10 days ago.
What license does Obsidian MCP Server use?
Obsidian MCP Server ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Obsidian MCP Server's commits signed?
95% of the last 100 commits to Obsidian MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Declared
MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Obsidian MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Obsidian MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Listed 1Rank 1
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 56 spots (#992 → #1048)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #979
GitHub → npm: obsidian-mcp-server

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 20.3 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/obsidian-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/obsidian-mcp-server)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/obsidian-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/obsidian-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON